Hello. This is my first post on this forum, and I'll probably disappear shortly. However I wanted to comment as it will likely answer the stuff above.
The fellow who was looking for gerbers, and BOM, for Frankenso look here.
https://sourceforge.net/p/rusefi/co...e/rusefi_hardware_history/frankenso_rev00.40/
Please note that R0.5 is still in development, and R0.4 is currently the most used version. Development has been slowing as the changes from R0.4 to R0.5 are fairly minor. Also please note that the assembled boards have been much more successful projects. We have had very few people assemble there own boards successfully. Neither of the primary developers at rusEFI have hand built these boards. If you hand assemble please document the effort and update the wiki. We would be happy to see this better documented, but we do not have the pictures, and such to do it ourselves.
I wanted to chime in as I have been personally threatened by Bruce. I do not participate in any kind of clone, either software or hardware. I know others have had similar issues to what I had. In my case, the threats were not C+D, but it was vague claims of patent infringement, even though I do not MFG hardware. It sounded like a C+D was coming, so I stopped e-mailing and the problem seems to have gone away. That was many years ago, and I do not have negative feelings over it. I understand the desire to protect the product. I see Bruce's reactions as normal, and expected for a closed project.
I'm one of the primary developers at rusEFI. I'm a big fan of open source, and do not have any biffs with people who try to make money with closed projects. I have learned allot from open source projects which allows me to learn low level details, and I want to give back to the community which has given me so much. I'm all for people getting stuff out there, and MS has gotten functional systems in the hands of many people, which is great. However just like a mac isn't for everyone, a closed systems is also not for everyone.
In my case I want to do some science experiments, and if these crazy crack pot ideas work, they could have some very important impacts. I don't want the risks of entanglements caused by the MS licencing. So I look for an open system, which will not have those issues.
This thread was about Speeduino, which is also a great effort, and I'm glad to see he's doing some cool stuff. I have offered him advice on how to make things more robust. I hope he does well with his efforts. However I generally feel that for low cost hobby ECU's, that rusEFI has hit the major features that people are looking for in hobby projects.
Also note the rusEFI hardware design intent is posted here, feel free to comment if these specs are missing something. Also if you know how to verify if the intent was upheld, feel free to let me know. I'd really like to see if I was successful in hitting these goals.
http://rusefi.com/wiki/index.php?title=Manual:Hardware
Also the history of the board / dirty laundry is here. Feel free to tell me it sucks, and give me specifics. I once got a complaint that the original regulator would not up hold load dumps per ISO blah blah blah. So I made a bunch of changes and I believe it now upholds that ISO specification.
https://sourceforge.net/p/rusefi/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/hardware/frankenso/known_issues.txt
Can anyone tell me when MS changed the IAT resistor from 2.2k to 2.7k? Also can you tell me why it changed? I feel it's important to post this kind of history such that existing hardware can be corrected and verified. This is why I post the known_issues.txt log. It lets people know what is changing, and they can verify if these changes happened to their boards.
I know that davebmw once had some issues with MS. He was not able to post that in MS forums, so he posted his suggestions here.
http://forum.diyefi.org/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=285&start=12
Any how that's enough for a first post. Keep doing cool things.