• Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
    You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software here

    Thank you for being a part of our community!

Any issues with using a copper washer inside crankcase?

IansPlatinum

Active member
Joined
Jul 23, 2018
Location
Texas
Hard to find the answer but I'm pretty sure it's safe, wanted to double check before I put everything back together

I'm using a cut down copper washer as an O ring retainer on the oil pump tube:

Any reason not to proceed?

Looks like some crank bearings contain copper as an alloy, but I can't think of anything inside any crankcase made of pure copper.

ssdHnTDh.jpg
 
The question isn't:
Does copper dissolve in oil and float around the engine destroying everything in its path?

The question is:
Why do you need another "retainer" besides the flange built into the pipe?
Is it not tight enough?
Does the pipe fall out of the block or pump?
Are you using the wrong square-cut seals and trying to compensate?


oil-pump-seal.jpg
 
I mean...other than it likely leaking worse with just a copper washer resting against the bubble on the pipe.

Suppose you could braise something to the pipe if you really wanted to that filled out the space a bit more/was ‘flat’ to support the sharp edged seal.

Without losing your mind making the fancier “oil pump max effect” pipe, the bigger questions often are; does the pipe fit/stay retained and is the seal life-span Acceptable?

:e-shrug: it’s mostly an ~20+year thing, dropping the pan with the engine in the car isn’t pleasant, but I have it down to 4-5 hours/leave the coolant/hoses and all that in it.
Won’t the rest of the engine & oil pump probably be all worn out by then?

Although 88+ maybe better seals, idk don’t have to change them that often on those.

Failing that, short of some kind of banjo or flare and eliminating hooptie rubber seals all together, not sure what the easy or best fix is there.
 
The question isn't:
Does copper dissolve in oil and float around the engine destroying everything in its path?

The question is:
Why do you need another "retainer" besides the flange built into the pipe?
Is it not tight enough?
Does the pipe fall out of the block or pump?
Are you using the wrong square-cut seals and trying to compensate?


oil-pump-seal.jpg

I know copper doesn't dissolve, but wasn't sure if it was prone to degradation from certain engine oil detergents

The pipe flange is round and smaller diameter than the block & seal

People have reported the seals being squeezed past the flange & block hole

I am using the square cut genuine volvo orange seals, same as what came out of the car
 
Since making this post, I found an aluminum washer (aw70/71 drain plug washer) that fits the bill. 17mm OD, just needs to be bored out to 13mm ID.

The copper one I made varied from 16.8-17.3mm OD but still fit on in the block hole.

Pipe flange is 16.3mm OD

O ring on pipe OD is 17.7mm, probably compresses to 17.5mm

9ohlZduh.jpg


TNp1xXBh.jpg


eYgVs1nh.jpg


SV0JvbIh.jpg
 
There's an entry on VOC about building up JB Weld around the flange, but if it were me I would lose sleep over the possibility of a chunk breaking off and ending up somewhere it shouldn't be.

The only problem I've seen with copper on ferrous metals is accelerated galvanic corrosion. That probably wouldn't be a problem in an oil soaked environment, but you're a bit better off with aluminum. At least on paper, your solution sounds really good.
 
I know copper doesn't dissolve, but wasn't sure if it was prone to degradation from certain engine oil detergents

The pipe flange is round and smaller diameter than the block & seal

People have reported the seals being squeezed past the flange & block hole

I am using the square cut genuine volvo orange seals, same as what came out of the car

That literally never happens if the tube is installed correctly. I have never had that pipe leak when it is properly installed on the 100+ turbo cars I've owned. You can not install the turbo with the return line attached and expect it to seal properly. That's how the 0-ring gets cut, or, ends up pushing past the step in the pipe. Just install the pipe after the turbo is installed and use a mechanics mirror to see that you have the o-ring properly seated before connecting the pipe to the turbo. You will see a thing ring of red between the step on the tube and the block tube bore. Don't use any sealant. Use oil to lubricate the o-ring as it slides into the bore. Start with the o-ring near the end of the tube. This is no different than installing a redblock water pump.
 
^Agreed.
It's more installer error & lifespan is ~20+ years correctly installed. :e-shrug:

It's not fun to do that job/pull the x-member down with the glowing oil lamp at idle (see cleanflametrap.com) & inspect the crank/rod bearings even if it didn't knock, but can be done quickly after the first 100 or so.

I've never had to re-do that job 100s later, although I have had a pipe that didn't fit as well as another & swapped it out with another one I had :e-shrug:.

I always laughed seeing the brickboard thing with the JB weld.
 
^Agreed.
It's more installer error & lifespan is ~20+ years correctly installed. :e-shrug:

It's not fun to do that job/pull the x-member down with the glowing oil lamp at idle (see cleanflametrap.com) & inspect the crank/rod bearings even if it didn't knock, but can be done quickly after the first 100 or so.

I've never had to re-do that job 100s later, although I have had a pipe that didn't fit as well as another & swapped it out with another one I had :e-shrug:.

I always laughed seeing the brickboard thing with the JB weld.

The only installs I have seen leak were the cars I bought that the PO thought he had a better idea. A couple of them were previously TB owned. One was silicon RTV'd to the block bore. It leaked like a sieve.
 
If we're switching to discussing the turbo oil return line, I have some words about that. It's not the block side seal that's the problem. That always goes perfectly. It's lining up the gasket and bolts at the turbo side. I hate that part so much.
 
If we're switching to discussing the turbo oil return line, I have some words about that. It's not the block side seal that's the problem. That always goes perfectly. It's lining up the gasket and bolts at the turbo side. I hate that part so much.
Lithium gluey grease is your friend, cleaning both flanges carefully.
No more wicking oil, easy to take apart in the future.
You can buy the sticky lithium greases for big $ at Wurth, if you have an account.
That said, I'm cheap and just use white lithium and stick it to the pipe carefully/keep it in place/use a magnetic flashlight shining upward at the bottom of the turbo.
Always a laugh going for a test drive and forgetting you left the magnet light stuck to the bottom of the car...at least you did the repair/treated the car/customer properly.

Always :oops: though if the customer hands you your flashlight back with a dead battery a few days later.
Not that I'd know anything about that...only takes once...

They don't make that gasket with metal in it with tabs that fold downward to keep it on the flange on the pipe located perfectly...because Volvo half-ass ****box that requires regular attention/fiddly adjustment :roll:.
It's euro-trash, not mid-90s awesome quality control/easily serviced japanese, what can I say?
Just be glad it isn't brit-ish (emphasis on the ish).
Though early 1800 are british POS.
& Volvos are sort of 1/3 spiritually/conceived/execution British.
1/3 american/simple copy, but scaled down to swedish roads/salt longevity, fuel econ, safety/efficient use of space standards, 1/3 germanic (they do have a mass production plan/Bosch/VDO FI/other parts, 1/3 british improvisation/clumsy govt war-leftover domestic production direct subsidy.
Interesting blend/mutt.
 
Last edited:
Good idea with the lithium grease. Other than annoyances like that tube, I'm not so sure about 90s Japanese cars being easier. Just think about replacing a Nissan KA cylinder head compared to a redblock head. At least we don't have to pull ALL of the covers.
 
That literally never happens if the tube is installed correctly.

Not really sure what the statistics are on it. But I've read multiple accounts of it and seen pictures.

And my logic on trying to fix it is:
1. low risk & low cost implementation

2. bad oil tube design imo, see point 3

3. later engine designs from volvo have a fastener on this tube. on the redblock, the oil pump bore is solely responsible for keeping the tube to block junction positively engaged.

4. Volvo has a history of changing suppliers or changing formulations on replacement parts. For a part that has not been standard issue on a car in 25 years, the only evidence that I have that this new oil tube seal is exactly the same as the original is the color. That's not very reassuring evidence. Half of volvo's rubber replacement parts lineup is trash, reportedly. But visually identical. Sure, we probably would have heard something if these new seals are trash, but I also don't want to be the first guy to find out. What if it happens in 100k miles? 50k? 30k? I don't think the average bricker is putting a ton of annual miles on their car.

5. the rounded shoulder pickup tube collar encourages circular deformation on the lower seal surface, as evidenced by the old ones I took out. Probably not a big deal, but this is a critical pipe and critical seal.


148628726.jpg
 
Last edited:
^Nissans are usually the exception, I hate them passionately.

Timing chain on V6 or KA altima, or trans on the hardbody pickup with the welded-in x-member.

Basic model Hondas and Toyotas are pretty painless, usually, but there are always exceptions.

Volvos are more british/using wrenches/open ended cave man tools.
Japanese there'll be a socket pass-thru so the robots on the assy line can assemble it quickly with perfect torque & future service can be done with something that isn't a cave man tool.

At least it isn't British...open ended wrenches 1-flat at a time or whit-worth sizes!
Cave man idiocy!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

That tube is definitely a cost-saving-compromise:
It's real cheap/easy to make with that little crinkle/bubble in it in one quick shot on a machine that pumps them out.
I get it, the pipe could be a better design, but I can tell you, in practice, I've changed tons of those things and seen the same car over a decade and didn't get any call-backs.

I will say the rubber failed sooner on the early-mid-80s cars it seems like if anything, and they also had the short gear oil pumps and those early B230s were thrown together garbage with some early tolerance/cost savings/quality control issues it seems. :e-shrug:
So much for military subsidy Bofors (makers of the gun/heavy infantry goods) forged cranks/tight tolerances being passed onto us automobile owning peasants 1983 B23 & earlier!

Doubt they had warranty claims/class action suits from that tube on the SOHC volvos (tho Federal mandate/lemon laws were less strict those years).

Doubt they failed within 10 years of even the lengthiest extended warranties offered by the company or implied/enforceable in court by the feds/customers/buyers. Internal TSBs/'campaigns' to brush over the issue it's hard to say, but the cars were all ~15-20+ years old when that was often an issue.

Gray area for court of public opinion/reputation, but IDK, if you've got a 20 year old/200k+ car and the oil light glows at idle or loses oil pressure at a bad moment and throws a rod, at some point it's sort of hard to blame the parent company in good faith, at least compared to other car manufacturers...if it were a giant nuclear reactor leak, maybe we'd think differently, regardless of any laws.

Also depends on your own expectations;
if the car didn't hurt you too bad/strand you at extremely inopportune times/or constantly break when it had a reputation for reliability, you're less likely to be disappointed. Lots of variables there.

Although, 86-87 were the two highest production years of 240 and 83-87 was kinda middle of the 240 run and the mass of examples you saw everywhere in those years that shops commonly repair them, so you're likely to do more transfer tube seals just because there were more cars of about that age likely to need them of those years as much as anything/hard to scientifically isolate.

Tough one too, as that pipe probably should have *some* compliance on those stupid seals/isolate vibration so as not to crack that thin cast aluminum housing on the oil pump there going from the rigid iron vibrating 4-cylinder to the pump.
Also, look at the pivot line/giant lever arm that is the oil pump mounted with 2-weenie little bolts on the small (hollow!) foot of the cast aluminum oil pump with minimal ribbing/dubious casting & material quality too.
Remind you of those weenie aluminum accessory brackets/bushings on the OUTSIDE of the motor?

IDK if adding a flange to the pipe close to the diameter of the inlets/outlets of the pump/block is wise/prudent (decreasing vibration isolation/some compliance in the pipe to move in multiple directions with variable intensity/amplitude/velocity/cycling frequency and still seal), hate to say it.

I've pondered how to improve that weak spot there, and no solution looks totally easy/good without custom 1-off stuff/great expense.
It's definitely plenty unpleasant to change those 20+ years out, though.
But if you install it correctly, you shouldn't get a call back and it should be good for ~20 years/200K at a time, there are worse things?
There are places that sell high quality / temp seals.
So far so good still with those at volvo/they look the same as my last revision NOS set (hi-temp certain durometer no-doubt) in a bag from ~15 years ago pre-ford/geely/240s/redblocks weren't far out of production (up to 1998 in euro 940s, up to 2000/pre ford in boats).
Typical volvo it's probably some weird/difficult to find proprietary metric size/profile. :roll:

Much like you perhaps, I stare at that thing, the monsters of OCD/fear of failure grow in my head, and want it to stay put forever/perfectly engineering constrained in no uncertain terms with no metal fatigue/fracture in the heating-cooling cycles/variable vibration, no wriggling/possible catastrophic domino-effect failure easily possible, but looking at the surrounding block/oil pump design, it doesn't look cheap/easy; everything looks somewhat compromised, but it lasts the warranty/works in 'concert' more or less as they designed/built it, in their block-headed ham-fisted volvo redblock way.

Would you rather fix a cracked/scattered oil pump or a couple bucks of o-rings and hopefully your oil pressure gauge just reads a little low, but crank/bearings are fine and you catch it in time?



IDK if I'd tout whiteblocks & oil supply :lol:
Horrible oil pan where the oil sloshes side-side.
Sludges up easy if you don't change the oil/use cheap oil/blocks the pickup.
Pan is a cold spot on an alloy motor that should have nice even temps/no cold spots somehow :roll:.
Pickup pipe o-ring isn't fully retained/sucks inward (I glue them with an oil resistant non-hardening minimal amount retaining compoind) if the oil is too heavy/winter or pickup is obstructed at all...or just phase of the moon.
Lifters tick/fail, rod bearings get wiped, oxygen in the oil supply/diminished oil supply. No bueno.
Pretty common.
 
Last edited:
\
IDK if I'd tout whiteblocks & oil supply

sure, but focusing purely on the pickup tube, it provides a better tube retention method.

maybe it's not a strong reason, but it seems to me that a swedish engineer said "this could be better" and implemented a better execution of the oil tube on the whiteblock

The o-rings still crack after 200k on the whiteblock, but I think that's more likely due to hotter oil b/c turbo
 
Not really sure what the statistics are on it. But I've read multiple accounts of it and seen pictures.

And my logic on trying to fix it is:
1. low risk & low cost implementation

2. bad oil tube design imo, see point 3

3. later engine designs from volvo have a fastener on this tube. on the redblock, the oil pump bore is solely responsible for keeping the tube to block junction positively engaged.

4. Volvo has a history of changing suppliers or changing formulations on replacement parts. For a part that has not been standard issue on a car in 25 years, the only evidence that I have that this new oil tube seal is exactly the same as the original is the color. That's not very reassuring evidence. Half of volvo's rubber replacement parts lineup is trash, reportedly. But visually identical. Sure, we probably would have heard something if these new seals are trash, but I also don't want to be the first guy to find out. What if it happens in 100k miles? 50k? 30k? I don't think the average bricker is putting a ton of annual miles on their car.

5. the rounded shoulder pickup tube collar encourages circular deformation on the lower seal surface, as evidenced by the old ones I took out. Probably not a big deal, but this is a critical pipe and critical seal.


148628726.jpg

It makes me wonder if that?s an original installation in that picture or if somebody?s been in there and installed that O-ring incorrectly. I?ve never seen that problem with oil pick up tube either. I?ve had more of these cars than you can count. Not one of them had a low oil pressure problem that was related to that seal. Maybe, I?ve just been incredibly lucky.
 
Back
Top