Hagar17
Active member
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2005
- Location
- Victoria BC
so... what cars have 9xx ECUs?
certain year / models?
certain year / models?
Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software here
Thank you for being a part of our community!
With that being said, I went and compared the stock 935NA map on TunerPro to LH24 Editor and TP shows the map ranging from 501-6350rpm vs 1600-6240rpm on the Editor.
For what it's worth...?
Gotcha. I knew it was old but didn't know the RPM was off. I haven't run it hooked up to the car yet because my Ostrich doesn't arrive until Monday!The released version of LH2.4 Studio is old. It doesn't use the correct (log based) formula for RPM. It just multiplies by 40. (it's actually selectable in one of the menus IIRC)
With tracing on watch any of the RPM tables while you rev the motor; it's way off. I'm sure the new version will be fixed.
It's mega-old then: http://support.moates.net/2008/09/11/ostrich-10-overview/
Can't fine anything about address tracing in the 1.0 docs either :-/ It only runs at 115,200 baud so it may not be fast enough for it...
so... what cars have 9xx ECUs?
certain year / models?
That being said, are you saying I should be able to open up my 951 bins with your 935 xdf? Because so far I haven't been able to, they seem to pull from different locations, or something. If I load a stock 951 bin, the main fuel map is filled with 255s and the load/rpm axis' are all sorts of crazy -1000s numbers going "up" to a positive number when nearing low rpm and higher loads on each axis.
Check here: http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=84817
Looks like it's a crap shoot from years 90-94. Seems like most of the 95 and up cars had them.
I'd just go look; it literally takes about the same amount of time as it would to find your car in the list.
sounds about right. I seem to recall this thing kicking around back in 03-04.
I'd think most if not all Efan cars would be 9xx ecus eh? and some of the non-efan cars as well
Also and once again ill be honest. I like the sound, I think its bad ass, i like it just as much as loud fuel pumps and turbo spooling, external waste gates and back fires. I think a bov fits my car perfectly and really completes the sound.
Correct me if i'm wrong, but I could just get the Ostrich, wideband and go, right? A chip burner isn't really necessary until and unless i want to actually make a chip out of my results.
What does that mean exactly? As in LH2.4.2 vs 2.4.4?the xdf has to match the rom version for TP, otherwise its looking in the wrong places and grabbing the wrong information.
My 1991 244 had a 951 from the factory. I think the 91+ cars had the 951? But that's an NA 240 I'm talking about, so I don't know about other cars.I'd think most if not all Efan cars would be 9xx ecus eh? and some of the non-efan cars as well
No correcting required, you are CORRECT!Correct me if i'm wrong, but I could just get the Ostrich, wideband and go, right? A chip burner isn't really necessary until and unless i want to actually make a chip out of my results. In the mean time, i could just run right off the Ostrich. Am I missing something?
I'd like to play, i've always been a fan of keeping LH. Seems like a good way to start learning EMS in general.
What does that mean exactly?
Seems like a good way to start learning EMS in general.
I understand the pulling from different addresses part, but not anything about how I know what ROM I'm dealing with(only bin/xdf and what computer it's supposedly for). Sorry, I'm not all up to the terminology and how it's applying/what it means... Or how to tell one apart(other than the xdf file not working properly with a certain bin, obviously). But maybe I don't need to know for any reason either?Different ROMs may have the functions you're trying to modify at different addresses. In one ROM the rev limiter can be at 0x727A and another ROM could have the rev limiter located at 0x323F. If you have the latter ROM and an XDF that points to the address in the former, you'd be changing the wrong byte(s).
What does that mean exactly? As in LH2.4.2 vs 2.4.4?