![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Boston
|
![]() 1992 240 B230F M47 LH3.1, 5spd manual.
The problem: Idle speed for my LH 3.1 is supposed to be (with A/C off) 775+/-20rpm. My idle is steady at around 950rpm, no surging, no hesitation. ![]() Things I've done over the past two weeks to troubleshoot:
edit: throttle position sensor seems to be bad? Ohm resistance with ignition both off and on was..
Left field question/guess: is it possible the A/C microswitch is stuck on causing the idle to sit at the 900 +/- 20 rpm that the car automatically increases to when A/C is engaged? I've never had the A/C on since the previous owner said it didn't work. The heater valves are also busted so I am forever getting a stream of hot air from the vents. Looking for suggestions on what to check next.
__________________
1992 240 GL (4dr, B230F, M47, LH 3.1) Last edited by seanile; 11-21-2020 at 03:51 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Boulder CO
|
![]() See Bentley section 250-3, or link here, on how to check and adjust the throttle linkage. If your throttle plate isn't closing enough, idle will be high.
To test the LH3.1 TPS, unplug the harness and measure ohms of resistance between the pins of the TPS itself. Ignition on or off doesn't matter since it's unplugged. If you rotate the throttle cable cam by hand, the pin 1-2 measurement should go up and down. Your 3.1K (3100ohms) measurement is a bit high, but alright by itself. Your 2.387K (2387ohms) measurement is pretty far off. Both A/C and shifting out of park/neutral on an automatic can increase the idle speed. If you can find a LH3.1 wiring diagram (maybe from a 740/940?), you can probably find the A/C and P/N wires on the ECU page. The P/N interlock, or jumper for a manual, are on the 240 Starting Circuit page. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monroe, OR USA
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Best I could find here, and I've looked for years for one. Two computer boxes, on left top pic LH 3.1, and right bottom EZK. I'd save this pic OP.
Throttle Body Adjustment here pic >A/C microswitch Looks like pins 14 and 15 are related to AC on LH box At AC dryer in engine compartment, one could check for voltage, with car running...just remove plug, insert voltmeter on removed plug side |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Footnote - LH 2.4 pinout and LH 3.1 pinout may or may not be the same...I don't have the time to compare, but here is LH 2.4's here, and LH 3.1 here
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |||
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Boston
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
i'll also look for voltage at the A/C dryer tomorrow, thank you. i PMed you a link to a 1992 wiring diagram set, page 21 has the wiring diagram for the LH 3.1, http://brickspeed.net/VolvoDocs/240-..._240__1992.pdf Last edited by seanile; 11-21-2020 at 08:52 PM.. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Monroe, OR USA
|
![]() Oscilloscope, tach/dwell meter etc. There is no way I would ever use a Volvo tachometer as a diagnostic tool. That is your first mistake.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Boston
|
![]() i fine tuned the throttle cable tension, control rod, and idle & WOT pulley stop positions per bentley 250-3, and checked the butterfly position as well using the above link from 84B23F. then i installed a new TPS and it doesn't seem like anything is different. lost daylight before i could check the TPS electrics and still have to check the a/c's circuitry for any sneaky voltage.
i'll check the car's rpms at particular speeds to see if the tach reflects reality at the appropriate gear ratios. also going to double check the fuel pressure regulator, a friend said that the vacuum should hold 3 bar steady. would love any other suggestions! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Never messed with it, nor read specifics, but its been suggested it has two functions:
1. WOT - Increases fuel enrichment 2. Idle RPM Only Idle air control actuator (IAC actuator) was designed to work at idle-RPMs only, not when driving with engine above idle RPMs. So, TPS must be adjusted to spec...foot off throttle pedal, switch's circuit for idle side is working. A brake booster can increase idle RPM when it starts to fail...so if its hose is removed from intake manifold, and the intake port plugged, this can be checked. Any air leak into intake side will increase idle RPM. Do note when reading, LH 2.2 is not the same as LH 2.4. Here is a FAQ, but examine this PIC closely, and notice what it says when current is off (aka unplugged IAC). FPR - Most likely a waste of time since O2 sensor via ECU can compensate. AMM/MAF - If idle is erratic, sometimes this is the issue. From AMM to throttle body, that "hose" can't have any holes in it...all intake air must pass thru AMM. AMM has a "burn" cycle to clean its sensing wire...AMM/MAF cleaning spray is expensive, but AMM could be sprayed...but this action may do nothing in regards to idle issue. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Boston
|
![]() The LH3.1 that i have doesnt have a switch unfortunately.
Have already cleaned the MAF and the hose connecting from it to the TB. Didnt see any cracks. I'm unfamiliar with the brake booster though will do some reading. Last edited by seanile; 11-28-2020 at 12:30 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() RE: "installed a new TPS"
I think I lookuped part number, and this "switch" is applicable to LH 2.4/LH 2.2 and LH 2.1, iirc. This switch has two functions: 1. WOT - Increases fuel enrichment 2. Idle RPM Only and at ECU, I suspect there are two pins that could be touched to "see" if either of these circuits are active, or not active. Same with AC's pin(s) at ECU. I'd use a high impedance volt-meter, or high impedance test light hooked up to battery power to evaluate at ECU. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Boston
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() Ok, two basic differences between 2.4 and 3.1...OP there got the CSV wrong...if a LH 2.4 vehicle had one, it most likely was an earlier model. My 1989 has one, but not the 1993.
RE: "predictive" fuel management & better fuel economy That's BS....fuel economy is based upon driver's behavior...I can still get close to 30 mpg with auto transmissions....3.1 were installed in stick shifts, iirc. Ok...up to speed now.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Board Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kansas, USA
|
![]() With engine warmed up, was the electrical plug removed from IAC, and then engine re-started? Idle did what?
Logic...at idle, several sensor devices (TPS, neutral switch...) could be used to inform ECM/ECU an idle state exists. But, AC engagement electrically would skew this state. So, if the mechanical aspects are near OEM design, then its an electrical/ECU issue. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|