DaytonAE86
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2006
- Location
- Gem City, USA
The o2 reading at .9v shows that it sees it is rich, very rich..... it should fluctuate from .4-.5v if all is operating properly.
-
Hello Guest, welcome to the initial stages of our new platform!
You can find some additional information about where we are in the process of migrating the board and setting up our new software hereThank you for being a part of our community!
Not the results I wanted
- Thread starter To old for this
- Start date
2manyturbos
Moderator
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2003
- Location
- Monroe, OR USA
^^ This. And it goes right along with what you are saying that it is getting lower fuel mileage than expected. A 561 ECU is not a reliable ECU. The 933 is a far better ECU.
To old for this
New member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2016
- Location
- Texas Panhandle
Thanks for all the tips. I will check my ecu stash.
To old for this
New member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2016
- Location
- Texas Panhandle
Update. 309 miles 12.3 gallons.25.2mpg. Don't know if winter or summer blend is being drank. Going to install the 933 ecu like 2manyturbos suggested.
ZVOLV
<Master Tech>
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2002
- Location
- California
Please tell me what is different about a 2.2 sensor vs 2.4 o2 sensor.
snailpoweredbrick
Active member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2009
- Location
- So Cal
Should be the same 3 wire O2 sensor.
To old for this
New member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2016
- Location
- Texas Panhandle
I need to research this. I used a lead pipe with the o2 in the converter which requires the long pigtail and truthfully I don't know where it came from. May be trying to get the last drop out of the turnip.
To old for this
New member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2016
- Location
- Texas Panhandle
933 installed. Seem to run better,revs easier.