home register FAQ memberlist calendar

Go Back   Turbobricks Forums > Mechanical > maintenance & nonperformance

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2013, 12:54 AM   #76
Lord_Athlon
Just damn
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Real world
Default

Cute pat on the back. Sell your design to everyone. Over 100 efficiency. You're creating energy. Science has tried and failed. Let it be known, crazy240 of Texas started the 2nd Texas oil boom
__________________
84 242 turbo msII
My build https://forums.tbforums.com/showthread.php?t=8675309
Lord_Athlon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 12:58 AM   #77
doucheNozzle
Newbie
 
doucheNozzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Pitt, 15147
Default

Why do I feel like this entire thread is an ad for some cleansing juice bull****?
__________________

'99 V70 NAA - So Slow
'04 V70 T5A - Feels Fast
doucheNozzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 01:30 AM   #78
Lord_Athlon
Just damn
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Real world
Default

Try it for yourself.
Lord_Athlon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 08:13 AM   #79
JohnMc
PV Abuser
 
JohnMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Louis
Default

Shine on you crazy dia... 240.
__________________
'63 PV Rat Rod
'93 245 16VT Classic #1141
JohnMc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 01:37 PM   #80
SuperSleeper
Board Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: FULTON OHIO
Default

Get a lower FPR or adjustable they are cheap.
SuperSleeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 01:57 PM   #81
JohnMc
PV Abuser
 
JohnMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Louis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSleeper View Post
Get a lower FPR or adjustable they are cheap.
LH will compensate for that. The O2 will read lean, LH will increase injector open times to compensate, until it sees the O2 sensor reading cycling back and forth across stochiometric again.

Unless you lower it a LOT, in which case LH will apply the maximum amount of correction it is allowed to do, then it will set the CEL.
JohnMc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 02:00 PM   #82
Lord_Athlon
Just damn
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Real world
Default

Run your car on nothing but hho. Run your house on it. Everything on it.
Lord_Athlon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 05:40 PM   #83
AJS
Board Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia
Default



This is sad. It cannot work, what you think you are seeing is not there. It's another factor or you are just working something out wrong.

It's not possible. It's proven not to be possible.



If something is impossible and you say it's possible then who is wrong?
AJS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2013, 06:14 PM   #84
apachechef
Burnt Sierra Madre
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fort Joe Smith, Klendathu
Default

I started praying for better gas mileage when I drive my car. I wrote down when I prayed before trips, and when I didn't.
Turns out, I get 2-2.5 better MPG when I pray before the trips.
My own research proves to me that my theory and calculations were right.
I also did run all the numbers you guys are working as we'll as a lot of other numbers.
So far I am getting 2-2.5mpg increase with using prayer every time so crunch your numbers again, add your highschool education and explain that to me.

Default
Just drove from San Antonio to Austin and filled up when I got here.
Miles driven on last tank with premium and prayer=276.5
Gallons filled=10.8
Miles driven on last tank with premium and without prayer=256.4
Gallons filled=11.1

I am at a 3 degree difference in OA temperature, it is a cloudy drizzly day and even my tire pressure is the same..
Run your own calculations..

I drove my miles.
I filled my tank.
My careful logging and monitoring gives me 100% proof that prayer does increase the mileage on my car.
So at the end of the day you can post everything you find on google along with your own ignorance and disbelief, I know for a fact that prayer does increase mileage on my car even tho it is only a very small amount.

I am still not seeing anybody else on here that has even tried it and has their own test results to go by so until you do stop and think about how stupid lazy and ignorant you sound posting google search results saying prayer does not work when that is all the information you have.
I did not believe in it at first but I saw a possibility and I was right. Until I tried my own I could not be sure so that is why I am doing this and guess what. I am still showing positive results!

not the fact that I believe the prayer works it is the fact that you are telling me I am imagining my own very documented and hard work. I can assure you that no paper work or video of other people's test results is going to convince me that my bible combubulator on my car which i built and I have done my own research on is not working.
You do not have to believe me but telling me I am fooling myself when you have not layed your hands on it(I love how i don't need to edit this) or even tested one of your own does not give you the right to tell me that my brain is not working right.

I drove around town some earlier with my new bible installed.
Mileage driven=119.7
Gallons filled=4.1
MPG=29.195

What does this prove to me? My own research proves to me that my first theory and calculations were right.
HHO does not work to the claimed 30-50% increase in MPG. The increase in mileage is exactly what I expected after cutting the fuel supply short.
My Gaines from 25-29MPG is not due to HHO.
So why did I do it? Now I know. I am not relying on a possible hoax or theory or other people and also I did gain MPG using HHO without a potentiometer.
My calculations for just the fuel cell without a potentiometer was also the same as you guys. But then I started throwing additional factors in as we'll as studying the exact electronics installed on my car vs other people studying their Fords and Toyotas.
I saw a possible loop hole in a couple studies and guess what.. I was right.
I did increase my MPG by using prayer.
I went from 23-25MPG every single time I tested it.
My own work is not going to fool me and neither will anything you can find on google.
My conclusion? Remove the St. Christopher staute as i do not see it to be safe on my DD and keep running my bible until summer heat hits here. Then I will be replacing it with a +T since the gains I am getting are not sufficient enough to ignore the fact that the car has no soul.

If you guys study the postings I was originally asking if anybody knew a easy way to restrict the fuel supply on my car. Not a single one of you actually gave me any answers as to how to do it at all.
I actually figured it out and tried it while you we're telling me it could not be done.
In my holy book that is win to me and fail to you.
Next time, at least speak from experience.
Oh wait.. It is a double win. I am still getting better MPG with god as my co-pilot.

All you haters stop saying god is a fairy tale, my research is PROOF enough for me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by lummert View Post
Dammit, Lummert.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse8931 View Post
Well keep us updated on how your dumbass plan goes.
apachechef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 03:19 PM   #85
ziddey
Board Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bkny
Default

You ****ed with the lambda feedback. I'm surprised the ECU hasn't thrown any codes yet.

I'm imagining that there's no "winter blend" for gas down in Austin? I drove a 90 760 cross country (LH2.4) and fuel economy was heavily affected by gas. I still have all the receipts somewhere, but got 3mpg better (20mpg->23mpg, 15%) getting ethanol-free gas. That said, there's something wrong with the thing, so that may not be typical...
ziddey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 04:44 PM   #86
JohnMc
PV Abuser
 
JohnMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Louis
Default

Pseudoscience is strangely appealing to many people.

This is sort of like homeopathic mechanic-ing.
JohnMc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 05:04 PM   #87
ziddey
Board Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: bkny
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnMc View Post
Pseudoscience is strangely appealing to many people.

This is sort of like homeopathic mechanic-ing.
I kind of like the idea of singh grooves though. But every time I'm slapping a head on, I just got it back from the machine shop all nice and don't want to screw with it. If I still lived near picknpulls, I'd grab a rando head and just goto town.
ziddey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2013, 05:31 PM   #88
Haps
Volvoless
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Default

Run the electrolysis with a solar panel on your roof... Then you'll be getting somewhere. (But not without producing a hell of alot more than 1L/h.)

Or just keep going on like the crazy old lady next door about how you're making something out of nothing.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fraktion View Post
I believe the term for what he's done here is yolo
Haps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2018, 04:53 AM   #89
MikeSwanson
Board Member
 
MikeSwanson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Tucson, AZ
Default

You guys are not out any money he did not ask for your opinion yet you flame the hell out of him.
MikeSwanson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2018, 05:24 AM   #90
VB242
Mojo Stealer
 
VB242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Virginia Beach
Default

Tldr but Mega/microsquirt and you can set it as lean as you dare if someone hasn't already suggested it. There is no free lunch though.
__________________
1980 primer JDM flares franken-242DL, 1989 silver 780 sienna rear spring nivomat delete
VB242 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2018, 05:34 AM   #91
MikeSwanson
Board Member
 
MikeSwanson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Tucson, AZ
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJS View Post
No one has ever been able to show any scientific based proof.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...10016815001714

Alexandria Engineering Journal
Volume 55, Issue 1, March 2016, Pages 243-251
open access


Abstract
The objective of this work was to construct a simple innovative HHO generation system and evaluate the effect of hydroxyl gas HHO addition, as an engine performance improver, into gasoline fuel on engine performance and emissions. HHO cell was designed, fabricated and optimized for maximum HHO gas productivity per input power. The optimized parameters were the number of neutral plates, distance between them and type and quantity of two catalysts of Potassium Hydroxide (KOH) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH). The performance of a Skoda Felicia 1.3 GLXi gasoline engine was evaluated with and without the optimized HHO cell. In addition, the CO, HC and NOx emissions were measured using TECNO TEST exhaust gas analyzer TE488. The results showed that the HHO gas maximum productivity of the cell was 18 L/h when using 2 neutrals plates with 1 mm distance and 6 g/L of KOH. The results also showed 10% increment in the gasoline engine thermal efficiency, 34% reduction in fuel consumption, 18% reduction in CO, 14% reduction in HC and 15% reduction in NOx.
MikeSwanson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2018, 07:24 AM   #92
doucheNozzle
Newbie
 
doucheNozzle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Pitt, 15147
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeSwanson View Post
You guys are not out any money he did not ask for your opinion yet you flame the hell out of him.
K.
doucheNozzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions Inc.