home register FAQ memberlist calendar

Go Back   Turbobricks Forums > Mechanical > maintenance & nonperformance

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-08-2020, 10:52 AM   #26
philski o'flood
Board Member
 
philski o'flood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego
Default

the power of the Walker 81111 amazes DBarton

https://forums.tbforums.com/showpost...5&postcount=78
philski o'flood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2020, 11:07 AM   #27
philski o'flood
Board Member
 
philski o'flood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stevE85 View Post
Not sure how you're coming up with that part number. If you search under the link I left it does not list that part number for this application. This is literally what I do every day for work. I'm just trying to help someone fine the correct legal part. Cars fail smog all the time in CA for being "tampered", and by installing a cat that has the incorrect part number this is a reality. The listed legal Walker p/n's are 80507, 80827, and 81127. Just because the cat says carb compliant doesn't mean it's carb compliant for every application. The CARB look-up database is the only list you should go by when buying a replacement cat in CA.
https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/msprog/afterm...o/d-182-65.pdf
philski o'flood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2020, 04:02 PM   #28
stevE85
Formerly 1983_242
 
stevE85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Benicia, CA
Default

Still not listed for the exact application. 1983 245 2.1L lists the 3 part numbers I posted. The 81127 is the correct newest walker part number. Don’t know why you keep suggesting a 81111. Has correct eo# but incorrect part number. Might as well putt the part that CA says is legal. Just my opinion I guess.
__________________
1982 244-"Ivory Blanco" GM L33/5.3L, T56, Mcleod twin disc, Gen 2 billet 7875, 44mm gate, 2.50 Hot/Cold sides, LJMS Stg2 turbo cam, PAC springs, H2O/Meth, 9.5psi/@13*, Etc.
stevE85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2020, 04:22 PM   #29
philski o'flood
Board Member
 
philski o'flood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Diego
Default

yep you are right, '83 2.3L yes '83 2.1L no. Had to put my glasses on to see it.
philski o'flood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2020, 06:54 PM   #30
ZVOLV
<Master Tech>
 
ZVOLV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by philski o'flood View Post
the power of the Walker 81111 amazes DBarton

https://forums.tbforums.com/showpost...5&postcount=78

Yep. I've put a new cat on before and blown zeros.
__________________
No Start Thread
ZVOLV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2020, 07:32 PM   #31
stevE85
Formerly 1983_242
 
stevE85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Benicia, CA
Default

The walker cat is the best cat for the red block cars for sure. More Nox Reduction than any of the others. But, like zvolv just said it will blow zeroes.
stevE85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2020, 12:46 AM   #32
adamdrives
Board Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Jose
Default

Replaced the cat and she passed well under all limits. Time to have fun!
__________________
Feedback thread
78 242 DL 189k
83 245t+ic 136k
89 745tic 204k
05 S60R 161k
08 S80 V8 108k (for sale, message me)

Last edited by adamdrives; 07-30-2020 at 11:57 AM..
adamdrives is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions Inc.