First of all, why are you bothering with this camshaft swap? It's small for still small. Second, is the head shaved or a thinner headgasket installed?
Stock for stock, doing 20+ cam changes, I have had to change lashes exactly never.
Because you don't care, and you haven't done enough cam changes.
I'll just subscribe to see if you have any big differences going from A to V. I'm going from a 530 with a B cam to a 531 with a V cam, just haven't had a place to do the swap.
You'll lose low end power and efficiency by doing that swap, assuming nothing else is changing and you aren't using a thinner headgasket or shaving the head.
For reference:
240 B230E had 530+A-cam: 95kW@5250rpm 190Nm@3000rpm
740 B230E had 530+V-cam: 96kW@5500rpm 190Nm@3300rpm
I have a feeling the exhaust on 240 is more restrictive than 740 which can play a role, but not sure?
Nice! Yes, they're basically the same performance but the V has a more modern profile that has less idle emissions, in my opinion.
It's probably obvious that both cams with a 531 head will produce better numbers, however I truly hope it ends up being better then a difference of 1 for my application.
Better assuming you're looking at higher rpm. The 531 is not the best for low rpm performance, and isn't necessarily a great idea until you get into camshafts with over 12mm of lift.
You can also turn up the ignition advance and grab what feels like a bit more power. Just get a timing light and rotate the distributor or get sbabbs' EZK chip if you are on LH 2.4.
Depending on what you do, you may not want to run more ignition advance than stock.
Do you guys think advancing or retarding the cam and dizzy might be a good idea? I've read that advancing can give more top end while retarding can give more bottom end.
Like mentioned above, advancing the camshaft brings the powerband down a little(sometimes with almost no difference experienced). Retarding the camshaft can bring the power band higher(sometimes with almost no difference experienced). Sometimes straight up is best, but you need to try it and choose for yourself. Different camshafts and different setups like different things. A dyno helps, too.
Bringing this thread back up.
I've read that a few guys shoot for lifter/lobe clearances of .015-.016. What I was wondering is since the tolerances are .012-.016 why not shoot for the tighter of the clearances?
Clearance depends on your goals, the engine and the camshaft. With a V cam, it's a pretty small cam so you can set it tight for more fun and not really have to worry about anything. Factory spec is .016-.018", but I've run as tight as .013" on the intakes and .014" on the exhausts(just to give them a little more seat time to bleed off heat). The tighter you make it, the "larger" the camshaft will be. If you have trouble passing emissions, you can run looser clearances(.020") to make the camshaft idle better. You won't have any trouble with a V cam at all, if it's running properly otherwise.
Probably just because the mentality is that if it's within the 0.012-0.016 checking spec, it's not worth the time to adjust. If you ARE going to bother with it, put it within the spec that the shims have tolerance for (0.05mm).
It's nice to replace all eight shims so the new cam has a new surface for the lobes to press against. But I've also just changed cams and run what ever shim was in there.
It's not necessary, but you can. The valve clearance may change by a hair once the new shim gets it's coating removed and everything settles.