142 guy
Member
- Joined
- May 31, 2014
- Location
- Saskatchewan, Canada
Dial caliper - as in vernier caliper with a dial? Requires a super steady hand! A dial gauge on a magnetic base will give more consistent measurements of valve lift. Measuring movement off the top of the retainer incorporates the effect of rocker ratio and cam lift. Measuring direct pushrod movement eliminates rocker ratio; but, is exceedingly hard to do as the pushrod has to remain centered during the measurement.
Adjusting your valves so that the clearance variation is within 0.01" is too much. You will not get an accurate measurement of the variance in valve lift. Stock total valve clearance is around 0.02" (depends on which engine / cam) and you should be doing a go / no go measurement setting the clearance to within 0 to + 0.002" of whatever the clearance recommendation is for your cam. To help get a more accurate lift measurement, you can zero out the lash on each cylinder (at TDC firing) just for measurement purposes - takes the variance in valve clearance out of the lift measurement.
Volvo B18 / B20 rockers purportedly have a reputation for variance in the effective rocker ratio. I measured valve lift on a fresh B20E rebuild (D cam with stock springs) with the original rocker faces resurfaced to remove the wear grooves. The valve lift variance from the average lift was -1.7% to +2.1%. This is a combination of rocker ratio variance, cam lobe variance and measuring error. My take was that the variation in rocker ratio is perhaps a bit overplayed, or I lucked out and got a good production run (I think not). They do have a deserved reputation for having a rocker ratio that is uniformly less than the claimed ratio of 1.5 (mine are closer to around 1.4).
Your valve lift variance is around +/- 8% from average. The internet wisdom says that the Volvo B series rocker ratios can have a very large variance. However, based upon my experience you would have had incredibly bad luck in order to get a batch of rockers with rocker ratios that far out. I think the rocker lift variance is oversold which kind of leaves the cam as the culprit. However, I would do a more accurate valve lift measurements before jumping to the conclusion that the cam is toast. Also, even if the cam is wearing, if you have reset the valve clearances the noise should go away until the cam wears and the clearances open up again.
Finally, your average valve lift is around 0.40". Is that what the cam spec sheet says the lift should be with the stock rockers? If the spec sheet says the lift should be more, then the cam probably is definitely toast. If 0.40" is the correct lift, then why would you bother putting in double valve springs? The stock D cam has a 'rated' valve lift of 0.42" with a 1.5 rocker ratio and works satisfactorily with the stock single springs (as long as you retain the OEM red line). Higher effective spring rates just increase wear and parasitic losses. If you do compare the actual lift with the spec sheet lift, take consideration of the fact that your rocker ratio is probably less than the commonly assumed value of 1.5.
Adjusting your valves so that the clearance variation is within 0.01" is too much. You will not get an accurate measurement of the variance in valve lift. Stock total valve clearance is around 0.02" (depends on which engine / cam) and you should be doing a go / no go measurement setting the clearance to within 0 to + 0.002" of whatever the clearance recommendation is for your cam. To help get a more accurate lift measurement, you can zero out the lash on each cylinder (at TDC firing) just for measurement purposes - takes the variance in valve clearance out of the lift measurement.
Volvo B18 / B20 rockers purportedly have a reputation for variance in the effective rocker ratio. I measured valve lift on a fresh B20E rebuild (D cam with stock springs) with the original rocker faces resurfaced to remove the wear grooves. The valve lift variance from the average lift was -1.7% to +2.1%. This is a combination of rocker ratio variance, cam lobe variance and measuring error. My take was that the variation in rocker ratio is perhaps a bit overplayed, or I lucked out and got a good production run (I think not). They do have a deserved reputation for having a rocker ratio that is uniformly less than the claimed ratio of 1.5 (mine are closer to around 1.4).
Your valve lift variance is around +/- 8% from average. The internet wisdom says that the Volvo B series rocker ratios can have a very large variance. However, based upon my experience you would have had incredibly bad luck in order to get a batch of rockers with rocker ratios that far out. I think the rocker lift variance is oversold which kind of leaves the cam as the culprit. However, I would do a more accurate valve lift measurements before jumping to the conclusion that the cam is toast. Also, even if the cam is wearing, if you have reset the valve clearances the noise should go away until the cam wears and the clearances open up again.
Finally, your average valve lift is around 0.40". Is that what the cam spec sheet says the lift should be with the stock rockers? If the spec sheet says the lift should be more, then the cam probably is definitely toast. If 0.40" is the correct lift, then why would you bother putting in double valve springs? The stock D cam has a 'rated' valve lift of 0.42" with a 1.5 rocker ratio and works satisfactorily with the stock single springs (as long as you retain the OEM red line). Higher effective spring rates just increase wear and parasitic losses. If you do compare the actual lift with the spec sheet lift, take consideration of the fact that your rocker ratio is probably less than the commonly assumed value of 1.5.
Last edited: