home register FAQ memberlist calendar

Go Back   Turbobricks Forums > Mechanical > performance & modifications

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-24-2009, 12:02 PM   #51
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

TD04HL-13G-6cm2
360 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
324 practical max CFM

TH04HL-15G-6cm2
428 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
405 practical max CFM

TD04HL-19T-6cm2
500 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
430 practical max CFM

...from Stealth 316's site. The jump from 15G>19T is smaller than the jump from 13C>15G...it's an improvement for sure, but my only beef with the 19T is cost and availability. Very rarely do they come up for sale, and new ones are close to $1000 on eBay sometimes.

Hard to turn away a Holset that makes very similar numbers and costs $165, and is available everywhere.
__________________
Sean Williams
'94 850 Turbo Wagon (daily) :: 14.0 @ 98.5
B5234|AW50|TLAO tune|3" exhaust|NA cams|65mm tb|38mm BOV|E40 blend
'75 244GL (project) :: 8.4 @ 85.6
B230FT|AW71|1031|gutted|TLAO chips|welded 3.73|19T|3" exhaust|IPD cam|E62 blend|55 lb inj. (@ 4 bar)
CLICK HERE for the 244 BUILD THREAD!
BRAND NEW Mitsubishi 18T and 19T turbo conversions for sale...from $450...CLICK HERE or PM for details!
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:06 PM   #52
TerribleOne
ZoomZoom
 
TerribleOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Mangohick Va.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 740Weapon View Post
and as far as i am concerned a holset is a terrible choice (for dragracing). you can't spool the things properly off the line so any additional amount of horsepower they can make doesn't really matter.


Eh.. I woudln't exactly say that.. see with our small tired cars it's kinda easy to overtorque the car coming out of the starting beams and with a TD04HL turbine housing of even 7cm you're choking the exhaust stream big time past 5000 which is where you end up going through the gears on a drag run, especially 1/4 mile tracks where wind resistance becomes even more of an issue.

So to say a holset is terrible for drag racing would be an un-true statement.

Pair your 19T against my 60-1 in equally setup 240s with the same tires etc..
up to the 330 mark it'd probably be reaction time and shift points.. but after the 1/8 mile I'd probably start walking you by a half car because I can move more air into the engine with a properly sized compressor housing, and I'll have less EBR to face once I get past 6800 where I usually shift. Ideally I'd trap a speed 2-3 mph faster.. which would indicate more HP which is kinda what I'd want with a car with small tires on a dragstrip.
__________________
75 242GL - LS turbo, 4L80E, narrowed four linked 9"
89 244DL- Mazda 2.3 MZR, S366, 5R55E on Electromotive TecGT with PCS paddle shifters
94 945- Beater
93 965- For sale
91 940SE- Roller, for sale

TerribleOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:06 PM   #53
ZVOLV
<Master Tech>
 
ZVOLV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Default

Im hanging out with the Rice Krispy dudes Snap and Krackle around 12psi on 15g. Stock 2.4 with bigger injectors. 15g hits fuel cut too No point in going bigger unless some tuning is done. I dont want to hang out with Pop.
__________________
No Start Thread
ZVOLV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:07 PM   #54
olov
doing something stupid
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: warrenton, nc 27589
Default

to l8:

one could say the same about a 15g, which CAN cost more than an equivalent t3, t3/t4 or holset

to each his own, but from what i've seen, the 19t is clearly bigger and better for a redblock than a 15g, so i agree with the op
__________________
Quote:
opinions are like ***holes, i have one, and they're censored on tb
olov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:09 PM   #55
tryingbe
Boosting along.
 
tryingbe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
but my only beef with the 19T is cost and availability. Very rarely do they come up for sale, and new ones are close to $1000 on eBay sometimes.

I'm working to bring out some rebuilt 19T, for under $650.


Nice things about TD04HL type of turbos are, they are drop-in for 90+ or FWD guys with no modification needed or you can easily buy parts that are made for them.
__________________
85 GLH 367whp
00 Insight mpg > yours.
tryingbe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 12:43 PM   #56
lookforjoe
Making Volvo Parts Fit
 
lookforjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Rockland County, NY
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
TD04HL-13G-6cm2
360 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
324 practical max CFM

TH04HL-15G-6cm2
428 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
405 practical max CFM

TD04HL-19T-6cm2
500 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
430 practical max CFM

...from Stealth 316's site. The jump from 15G>19T is smaller than the jump from 13C>15G...it's an improvement for sure, but my only beef with the 19T is cost and availability. Very rarely do they come up for sale, and new ones are close to $1000 on eBay sometimes.
I can assure you that the performance difference going from 15/16 to 19T is vastly superior to the 13g/15g upgrade, regardless of what is posted on stealth's site (not tested on a Volvo, as I'm sure you're aware - the characteristics of the mitsu V6's they're testing them on are quite different. Also, the late angle housings are 7cm2, not 6 as he tested. Brand new (sold as reman, of course) 19T's from the dealer are $695 wholesale. Cheaper than 18T's.
__________________

My XR July2013 - 446AWHP @ 8K rpm C30 AWD conversion Feedback Thread
lookforjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:04 PM   #57
BDKR
Section 9
 
BDKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Horizons Cave
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lookforjoe View Post
Yes, the rods are weak. Higher RPM's can handle it, it's just excessive torque @ low rpm - it's no different than NOS - you wouldn't want a sudden massive increase @ low rpm, it just can't handle it.
Still doesn't make sense, but that's cool. I still like the Whiteblock motors and Mitsu's. I have a Garrett now and I'm sure it's going to get closer to the promise land tho.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BDKR View Post
My guess would be that the ignition timing is too advanced for the amount of air that turbo is flowing at that RPM and the resulting detonation is what's bending the rods.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricF View Post
I think it's something to do with cylinder pressure and piston speed, coupled with sensitivity to ignition timing. The 4 valve chambers are very fast-burning chambers, the 850's rod-stroke ratio sucks, and cylinder pressures are very high with high boost levels at low RPM.One degree of ignition angle means a whole heck of a lot more on an 850 than on a huge open chambered 8 valve redblock, and a lot more than at high RPM when you have more overall advance and the piston is moving a lot faster. This in addition to the fact that with a very heavily bleeded or blocked wastegate signal spells very very tough to control boost spiking characteristics above a certain boost level, really makes it a dangerous turbo if you don't know what's up at all times. (Say, 20-24 psi peak pressure on a 6 psi wastegate, now we're talking danger, have seen 28-29 psi spikes on my old 850).
It seems Eric that you agree with me.

Just to make sure we are all cool, I'm still a fan of the TD04HL. A 19t on a Redblock even with an M cam would spell fun and giggles like it's going out of style.
__________________
Quote:
For all you Dijkstra fanboys:

Knuth also cites a letter sent to him by Dijkstra, in which the latter adds some nuance to this earlier statements: "Please don't fall into the trap of believing that I am terribly dogmatical about [the go to statement]. I have the uncomfortable feeling that others are making a religion out of it, as if the conceptual problems of programming could be solved by a single trick, by a simple form of coding discipline!"
BDKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:13 PM   #58
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Yeah, like I said...it's something to think about...but there are a lot of other viable options in the $700 range, ya know? Lots of comparing to do.

What T-brickers have posted numbers with this 19T unit? Doesn't seem to be very common.
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:15 PM   #59
EricF
Volvospeed Spy
 
EricF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Pete FL
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
What T-brickers have posted numbers with this 19T unit? Doesn't seem to be very common.
This year I'll be pushing it to its fullest capabilities on a redblock... Just wait ;)
__________________
-Eric
- 1995 850 T5-R Yellow - Back on the Road
- 2006 Dolphin Boats 22 Bull Center Console - 250 ETEC
EricF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:18 PM   #60
BDKR
Section 9
 
BDKR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Horizons Cave
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
TD04HL-13G-6cm2
360 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
324 practical max CFM

TH04HL-15G-6cm2
428 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
405 practical max CFM

TD04HL-19T-6cm2
500 max CFM @ 2.0 PR
430 practical max CFM

...from Stealth 316's site. The jump from 15G>19T is smaller than the jump from 13C>15G...it's an improvement for sure, but my only beef with the 19T is cost and availability. Very rarely do they come up for sale, and new ones are close to $1000 on eBay sometimes.

Hard to turn away a Holset that makes very similar numbers and costs $165, and is available everywhere.
+1! The bang for buck ratio here is way out of whack. If you insist on staying with a Mitsu, you would be far better off with a TD05 setup.

For half as much money as people are talking about for the 19t, I built my Cossie hotside, .70 ar T04E 46 trim turbo and I have another 70 CFM flow potential at the least and perhaps more based on using the larger compressor housing. Never mind the fact that Cossie hotside is far superior to the TD04HL wich really looks to be smaller copy of it.
BDKR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:32 PM   #61
thelostartof
unbalanced chemical
 
thelostartof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZVOLV View Post
Im hanging out with the Rice Krispy dudes Snap and Krackle around 12psi on 15g. Stock 2.4 with bigger injectors. 15g hits fuel cut too No point in going bigger unless some tuning is done. I dont want to hang out with Pop.
Then why do you not have a set of chips from me? Rumor has it the maps have been extended and the ziode is not needed untill. A higher boost pressue
__________________
Chip Feedback Thread / PM LH 2.4 Chip Prices
thelostartof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:34 PM   #62
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Good stuff here.

In doing a little research, the problem of bent rods in the whiteblocks has nothing to do with the turbo being "big." Because, well, it's NOT a big turbo, at all. It's a TD04.

The problem seems to be well documented...it's Motronic 4.3's inability to regulate boost well on the 850's when using turbochargers that flow disproportionately compared to the 15G's (the 19T is just a 15G with a slightly larger 46/58mm compressor wheel).

More info here...it was covered some years ago:
http://forums.turbobricks.com/archiv...p/t-10961.html
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:42 PM   #63
ZVOLV
<Master Tech>
 
ZVOLV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thelostartof View Post
Then why do you not have a set of chips from me? Rumor has it the maps have been extended and the ziode is not needed untill. A higher boost pressue
Cuz i missed your sale. I was ready to send payment, but they sold. PM me.

And Snap and Krackle are actually really cool guys. I just dont want to hang out with Pop. That guy is an *******. Koolaid man is a real ****bag.

I actually just put a turbo XS boost controller on, but left it hanging on the wastegate hose and the weight and boost pressure popped the hose off the turbo. I just left it that way because I want to be an overboosted tbricker.
ZVOLV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:43 PM   #64
ZVOLV
<Master Tech>
 
ZVOLV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: California
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
Good stuff here.

In doing a little research, the problem of bent rods in the whiteblocks has nothing to do with the turbo being "big." Because, well, it's NOT a big turbo, at all. It's a TD04.

Who cares about whiteblock benchracing? Its just ZOMG here comes 20psi in a split second!
ZVOLV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:46 PM   #65
JW240
All idiot, no savant
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Netherlands, Europe
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
The problem seems to be well documented...it's Motronic 4.3's inability to regulate boost well on the 850's when using turbochargers that flow disproportionately compared to the 15G's (the 19T is just a 15G with a slightly larger 46/58mm compressor wheel).
afaik M4.3 just has a fixed boost map, no feedback from a map sensor. a 19T will move more air with the same wastegate 'signal'.
__________________
240 | 1991 | 345K Km | B230F+T | Cosworth T3 60/63 | M90 | TrueTrack (parked for a few months)
dd: 940 | 1992 | B230FB
Husaberg FE450 70 degree '12 mx/supermoto swapped


Quote:
Originally Posted by Redwood Chair View Post
Don't forget about properly seasoning it on HF jackstands for a couple years whilst dreaming about big powah 'goals'.
JW240 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:47 PM   #66
thelostartof
unbalanced chemical
 
thelostartof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZVOLV View Post
Cuz i missed your sale. I was ready to send payment, but they sold. PM me.

And Snap and Krackle are actually really cool guys. I just dont want to hang out with Pop. That guy is an *******. Koolaid man is a real ****bag.

I actually just put a turbo XS boost controller on, but left it hanging on the wastegate hose and the weight and boost pressure popped the hose off the turbo. I just left it that way because I want to be an overboosted tbricker.
Wow lame excuse, waiting for a sale might cost you more in the long run as they might go up in price as more learn about how pimp they are

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZVOLV View Post
Who cares about whiteblock benchracing? Its just ZOMG here comes 20psi in a split second!
Pretty much, whiteblock is not needed to talk about here
thelostartof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:57 PM   #67
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JW240 View Post
afaik M4.3 just has a fixed boost map, no feedback from a map sensor. a 19T will move more air with the same wastegate 'signal'.
Ahhhh, makes sense now.

Of course, the ZOMG!!!! 20PSIZ!!111!!!!1! reaction is WAY more fun!
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 01:58 PM   #68
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thelostartof View Post
they might go up in price as more learn about how pimp they are
Please don't become the AIG of the Turbobricks world.
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:04 PM   #69
dieselboy
Whooty patrol
 
dieselboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SoCal/ Ramona
Default

I like turbo lag. It's that feeling you have when you know what's coming and your passenger has no idea.
__________________
'82 242t hy35 @28psi, ebay header, big intercooler, microsquirt ecm, rsi stg2 cam, arp headstuds, tremec tko600, 3" exhaust, 13" brembos, coilovers, saabspoiler, 245/40r17s, lots of yoshifab stuff.
'12 flex ecoboost "kats" car
'93 940 turbo lifted #trophyvo
'08 f350 4x4 v10 cclb
'97 f-350 4x4 offroad toy
'94 4700 dt466 International toterhome build
dieselboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:09 PM   #70
olov
doing something stupid
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: warrenton, nc 27589
Default

if you want quick spool build an na motor, imo
olov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:19 PM   #71
IceCold4x4
Board Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Default

The volvo td05 housing is crap. I had times almost a second faster and higher traps with my td04hl-15g. And I was running a 20g coldside that flowed about 600 + cfm
__________________
1992 Volvo 940 Turbo - RIP at the crusher.

2006 S60R - Electric Silver / Nordcap - Ipd strut bars, subframe inserts, H&R spacers, 245/40R18 Michelin Pilot Super Sports. (dreamed about this car for 6 years now I own one YEA!)

2006 XC90 V8 AWD - Triple Black - The gun mobile.
IceCold4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:22 PM   #72
EricF
Volvospeed Spy
 
EricF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Pete FL
Default

Since I have them side by side on the bench right now and we are covering this topic, I brought out the dial caliper to take some measurements.

Turbine outlet diameter:
Angle-outlet housing--- 2.830"
Straight-outlet housing--- 2.380"

Turbine inlet:
Angle-outlet housing--- 1.900x1.970"
Straight-outlet housing--- 1.485x1.865"

So the super amazing better-than-conical housing is still far short cross-sectionally on both inlet and outlet sides than the straight-outlet.

For the non-math types around here (myself included):

Angle-outlet has 30% more cross-sectional area at the smallest point of the outlet

Angle-outlet has 26% more cross-sectional area at the outside of the inlet... Now to be fair the straight-outlet can be ported out quite a bit, there is a "hump" on the inlet that you can grind down a bit. But it will take a lot of removed material to match the bigger inlet of the angle-outlet housing.

Both housings in question are 7cm2 in size.

I think that if you compared the conical outlet, the outlet would probably be closer to 45-50% of the outlet size of the angled housing.
EricF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:40 PM   #73
thelostartof
unbalanced chemical
 
thelostartof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Default

Why not? They seem to have a ton of $ coming in right now.

Downpipe prices have gone up mayve $30 in the last 4 years so that kind of price hike is not to bad.
Plus we are the only ones offering the rev limiter chips along with a lot of work done on the maps. Dyno time is coming up soon for a few cars to do a bunch more fine tuning for certain setups along with back to back tests and some oddball wiring sets to do these tests properly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
Please don't become the AIG of the Turbobricks world.
thelostartof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 02:44 PM   #74
thelostartof
unbalanced chemical
 
thelostartof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Default

Eric

Remember my post, not all angled outlet hosuings are the same. There are many out there just as crappy as the straight outlet in terms of inlet size

Oh and we have 3 or so of those larger better flowing stock angled outlets here for sale if anyone is lookng for them
thelostartof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2009, 03:20 PM   #75
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thelostartof View Post
Why not?
Because some of us realize the profit margin in the 15 minutes and the $3 in materials it takes to flash code to an e-prom.
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions Inc.