home register FAQ memberlist calendar

Go Back   Turbobricks Forums > Mechanical > performance & suspension

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-01-2010, 10:00 PM   #76
thelostartof
unbalanced chemical
 
thelostartof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Default

What size and brand?
__________________
Chip Feedback Thread / PM Current Chip Prices / PM for DownPipe & Exhaust Price / Silicone Cooling Hose Sets 2/7/9
thelostartof is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2010, 10:05 PM   #77
sbabbs
Board Member
 
sbabbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rushing Lane, Scappoose, OR
Default

I got new Mickey thompson ET drag last year in the 26 x 8.5 x 15 size. Before I ran those massive 28x9x15's and Greg's Ervin's 24x8x15's. I think the 26x8.5x15 fit a 740 the best. I put them on 7 inch aftermarket Enki wheels.


This is me at the track with the 28x9x15 tires on the car. I put wagon springs in the back to jack it up so the tires would clear. It was real tight that was why I went with a smaller tire.


This is a close up of the 26x8.5x15's on the car.


wide shot with the 26x8.5x15's.
__________________

1977 242 16v AQ171C M47
1984 245 D24 M46 ARP 11mm head studs Metal headgasket Biodiesel grown by Oregon farmers.
1990 745 B230FT M46 13c A-cam 3.31 528K MILES.
1991 744 RSI rods pistons Penta 2.5L steel crank 16v PZ cams Holset HC1 Getrag no sunroof no ABS 1041K 3.31 Aluminum hood 80's bumpers E85 quartermaster 7.25 twin disc MS3X-email tune from a reputable emailer.
1991 740SE B230FT motor blew...

Last edited by sbabbs; 02-03-2010 at 10:54 AM..
sbabbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 10:25 PM   #78
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Looking like my first round is gonna be with the 850. How does it work if I have 2 cars, again?! One FWD and one RWD. Will it just be the quicker one out of the two that counts for points at the end of the year?
__________________
Sean Williams
'94 850 Turbo Wagon (daily) :: 14.0 @ 98.5
B5234|AW50|TLAO tune|3" exhaust|NA cams|65mm tb|38mm BOV|E40 blend
'75 244GL (project) :: 8.4 @ 85.6
B230FT|AW71|1031|gutted|TLAO chips|welded 3.73|19T|3" exhaust|IPD cam|E62 blend|55 lb inj. (@ 4 bar)
CLICK HERE for the 244 BUILD THREAD!
BRAND NEW Mitsubishi 18T and 19T turbo conversions for sale...from $450...CLICK HERE or PM for details!
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2010, 10:42 PM   #79
klr142
Turbo, what?
 
klr142's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: OR
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
Looking like my first round is gonna be with the 850. How does it work if I have 2 cars, again?! One FWD and one RWD. Will it just be the quicker one out of the two that counts for points at the end of the year?
Correct. One turbo car in the turbo class, one NA car in the NA class, and one Hybrid in the Hybrid class per owner. Each class competes with itself for points, so there's an East or West winner for each class(boo).
klr142 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 08:50 AM   #80
EricF
Volvospeed Spy
 
EricF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Pete FL
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by klr142 View Post
Correct. One turbo car in the turbo class, one NA car in the NA class, and one Hybrid in the Hybrid class per owner. Each class competes with itself for points, so there's an East or West winner for each class(boo).
I would like to see a seperate class for FWD and for RWD, because they fundamentally are pretty dissimilar. But mainly because I have one of each that runs pretty well and quick

As an update, and to further my benchracing career, I drove the blue car the other day for the first time in 8-9 months. It felt... Slow. Even at 25 psi and running perfectly. I have been dailying the 850 for what, 6 months now? That means that it's significantly faster than the blue car. That's good for my trap speed hopes

The blue car ought to realistically be about a 101-102 mph trap these days, what with the angle-outlet housing compared to the conical and all (plus a few pounds less boost fade to match). That means that unless my highly experienced seat of the pants dyno is way off, the 850 should pull off a pretty solid trap as it is.

NA cams, a nice intercooler, and some dyno tuning, and the 850 could well make itself into something special ;)
__________________
-Eric
-1995 850 turbo - Ridiculous modifications list..
-1984 244 GLT - Blue.. 14.0 at 100.2.. TD04HL-19T-conical (SOLD)
FWD versus RWD Project - Who will win? (240 won ET, 850 won trap speed)
"...of all the liars among mankind, the fisherman is the most trustworthy." ~William Sherwood Fox
EricF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2010, 09:09 AM   #81
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Eric, glad I'm not the only FWD lover. That 850 really is just a joy to drive! Mine should be running in a couple days with a new head and 19T and N/A cams...I trapped over 98mph prior. Hoping to be well over 100 now.

Since I get one entry for each of the 3 classes, I'll have to run the '85 740 N/A. lol. Might be good for a low 19!

The 240 needs too much stuff right now, I'm taking a break from it for a little while.
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 10:39 AM   #82
EricF
Volvospeed Spy
 
EricF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Pete FL
Default

70% chance of rain and a very sick pregnant fiancee means that tonight is not a track trip for me. Ahh, the days when I would have driven up there just on the off possibility that it would have been dry still.. Not anymore
EricF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 06:27 PM   #83
Quattro
Board Member
 
Quattro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Florida
Default

Hopefully ill get my piece of **** 240 done.I can't wait to flog the **** out of it .
__________________
Need any 2/7/8/9 Parts?Contact me via pm!!
Quattro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2010, 05:06 PM   #84
rayshake
Board Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Baltimore,MD
Default

Sounds cool. Will try my best to help the East Coast.
__________________
waterproof Cf-29 keyboard makes you type like you mean it.

Ray
rayshake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2010, 10:29 PM   #85
EricF
Volvospeed Spy
 
EricF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Pete FL
Default

14.5 at 105... Boooo hisss!! Got some bad stuff going on with the front suspension, had some horrific hop and and I'm really glad nothing broke. Babied it on the next two runs (last was my best time, they were all 14.5 at 104-105 though). 2.5 and 2.6 60 foots... Car was literally in 100% daily driving form, showed up at the track and ran, all the crap in the back seat and trunk as usual (floor jack, tools, full size spare, fishing tackle and rods, etc). So I can say I drive a 105 trap car to and from work every day, and have that power being delivered every time I floor the car

Need to fix the front suspension and try again sometime with stickier tires with a little more aggression.
EricF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 03:56 AM   #86
WeezilUSA
Fair Enough...
 
WeezilUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver WA
Default

Thats a pretty high trap for your et.
__________________
R-Sport International Customer Service
For all RSI related messages, please email me (no PM)... Thanks! ben@r-sport.org
WeezilUSA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2010, 09:11 AM   #87
EricF
Volvospeed Spy
 
EricF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Pete FL
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WeezilUSA View Post
Thats a pretty high trap for your et.
Yeah the car moves pretty well, just couldn't get it off the line without the front suspension trying to self destruct. Once I fix it all up it should be ready for mid-13s. May dyno tune before then though, in which case it could be a little faster... And we'll have a numerical comparison of trap-WHP for manual 850s

It wasn't really in track form last night, but I'm pleased with the trap. I was dreading like 99-101 traps or something.

On a side note, my old setup that ran 13.3 at 107.4 only picked up I think 22 mph in the last 1/8 mile... This setup picked up 24-25 mph I'd really bet it could take on a lot of 108-110 trap cars from a roll. I'm excited to see what it will do this year.

Last edited by EricF; 02-11-2010 at 10:13 AM..
EricF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 09:17 PM   #88
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

14.0 @ 98.5 in the 850 today.
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 09:55 PM   #89
MeAtwagon
CTP_hookz
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: bristol ct
Default

[QUOTE=thelostartof;2901781]105.92mph @ 18psi with a slow launch, two boost leaks(maybe more as the TPS is one, HKS SSQV has one at the rear nut which needs a new o-ring, and the hot side IC hose on the turbo was coming off as I found this out this am) and no idea what afr's are as the WB is still freaking out, I swapped in a new one and it still is odd so I am updating firmware and then going back to figuring out why it seems to be down on power up top.



50 shot outta the hole

Last edited by MeAtwagon; 02-28-2010 at 10:01 PM..
MeAtwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2010, 11:17 PM   #90
sdturbo
Board Member
 
sdturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego CA
Default

12.4 @107... Slicks FTW



Car is pretty basic, 200k mile 91 b230ft short block, 89 760GLE 16v head, Chinabay "50trim", 90+ mani, yoshifab exhast adapter, yoshifab intake manifold, evo8 ic, MSnS, E85,moded g80, and some M&H slicks.

Because we only have one freakin track in socal I was only able to get 3 passes. The first pass I bogged hard off the line and ran a 13.2@107 with a 2.1 60'. 2nd pass I launched it too high and lit up the slicks and cut an all too familiar 2.5 60' with a 13.7@105. 3rd pass, I aired the slicks down to 15psi, did a much longer burnout and ended up cutting a 1.6 60' and running a 12.4@107. The car and drive both have more left, just need some more track time.
__________________
Josh
92 245 (TDI diesel powered.)
84 242 (16vT beater/track slut)397whp/11.6@118mph Sold
97 Land Rover Discovery (Volvo D24T swap)
65 Mini Cooper (B16 powered)
www.yoshifab.com Volvo performance parts.
(760)468-7002
sdturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 01:48 AM   #91
thelostartof
unbalanced chemical
 
thelostartof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Apache Junction, AZ
Default

Why does the mph look so slow? what was the whp of that setup again?
thelostartof is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 02:16 AM   #92
gross polluter
They see me trollin'
 
gross polluter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

316whp three days prior, dyno was 1500ft lower than the elevation of the track. Probably right at, or close to 300whp for todays runs.
__________________
'88 245 - 2JZGTE VVTi | MS3X ECU, MS2 TCU | GT3582R-HTA | Staged simultaneous dual fuel | 590whp 580ftlbs @ 22psi
gross polluter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 02:37 AM   #93
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gross polluter View Post
316whp three days prior, dyno was 1500ft lower than the elevation of the track. Probably right at, or close to 300whp for todays runs.
Unless your dyno was in Badwater, Death Valley, that's not physically possible. AAA Dragway is at 1,121 ft. above sea level.

Good runs in that beast! Though it should have some more trap speed in it for a 16V! I think Mike is trapping 107 in a stock 8V head.

I was about 4mph shy myself, not sure what to attribute that to. I'm not willing to bend rods to keep trying though. lol! I think the DD wagon is retired from track duty for a while!
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 02:45 AM   #94
klr142
Turbo, what?
 
klr142's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: OR
Default

Simon's stock 8V headed, 16T turboed, LH2.4 car traps 107mph as well.
klr142 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 02:54 AM   #95
sdturbo
Board Member
 
sdturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post

Good runs in that beast! Though it should have some more trap speed in it for a 16V! I think Mike is trapping 107 in a stock 8V head.
Keep in mind this car is on a stock 90+ mani with an adapter plate, stock cams, and a knockoff mystery turbo. The issue currently is that we are out of fuel pump on e85. Once that is resolved, we can continue forward with more boost/tuning. My driving also sucks, I spent a good amount of time scratching my ass on the 1-2 shift and sat on the rev limiter for the 3-4 shift (I should invest in a tach). Im sure that a few more runs would have us a bit deeper in the 12s and a higher MPH. All in all pretty happy to drag that number out of it in 3 passes.
sdturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 03:02 AM   #96
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

Makes sense. You're running the stock fuel pump I take it?
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 03:05 AM   #97
gross polluter
They see me trollin'
 
gross polluter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
Unless your dyno was in Badwater, Death Valley, that's not physically possible.
In terms of Mean Sea Level, you're right.
gross polluter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 03:10 AM   #98
sdturbo
Board Member
 
sdturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
Makes sense. You're running the stock fuel pump I take it?
Walbro 255 feeding the stock pump. I would be able to go a lot further on race gas with that setup but im going to continue playing the e85 game. Dual 044s and some -8 hose are on the shelf waiting to go on.
sdturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 03:14 AM   #99
L8 APEKS
Yayayaya, hohohooo!!!
 
L8 APEKS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Default

For the price difference alone, I'd stay E85! it's just so much cheaper. What kind of AFR's are you targeting?
L8 APEKS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2010, 03:20 AM   #100
sdturbo
Board Member
 
sdturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego CA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L8 APEKS View Post
For the price difference alone, I'd stay E85! it's just so much cheaper. What kind of AFR's are you targeting?
You can buy a lot of 110 leaded for the $400 I have in fuel pumps. While it is cheaper, you burn a lot more of it per mile so it works out to not so cheap. For making power on a supposedly fragile bottomend, I like the safety margin of e85 over dino gasoline.
sdturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.