home register FAQ memberlist calendar

Go Back   Turbobricks Forums > Mechanical > maintenance & nonperformance

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-22-2006, 03:49 PM   #1
Cliff
Board Member
 
Cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Default Freeze 12, Duracool and Envirosafe 12a?

Are these about same products? If not which one will be the coldest for my 245. I've already change the compressor, reciever/dryer and change all the o rings but I did not change the evaporator. Also, I already pulled vacuum and so far no leak.
__________________
For Sale 84 245 ms&s -e, v cam, greentops
E46 M3
Cliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 03:52 PM   #2
boosted
Board Member
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: melbourne, fl
Default

freeze 12 is synthetic r12. can replace r12 and works almost as well. duracool is for r134a, has less volume, and puts less of a load on the compressor.

unsure about envirosafe
__________________
240 driver
boosted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 03:55 PM   #3
blarf
Board Member
 
blarf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: disabled account land
Default

No, there is no such thing as 'synthetic' R12. No, not all alternative refridgerants are created equal.
__________________
blarf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 03:59 PM   #4
Cliff
Board Member
 
Cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Default

I just called Envirosafe and they told me to use the Industrial 12a. They are in IL and love it in their cars and better for warmer climates like here in FL.

Anybody have Experience with Industrial 12a?

Last edited by Cliff; 06-22-2006 at 04:06 PM..
Cliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 06:49 PM   #5
henry_sigourney
Board Member
 
henry_sigourney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lexington, MA
Default

Make sure whatever you choose is not flammable. Some of the R12 replacement products have butane and such in them. This is bad in a crash.
henry_sigourney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 07:49 PM   #6
Justin922
I'm back bitches!
 
Justin922's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, GA
Default

Just find a friend who is a mechanic and has thier section 509 epa cert and they can buy R-12. we can still get it here in GA and its best. otherwise just do the r-134a conversion and its not noticably any different if done properly. you will need to add more 134a than 12 to have it cool as well because 134a uses a slightly higher pressure. I did the conversion in my wife's 745 regina and used .4lb more 134a than it specified for 12. her vent temp is 41 deg f, thats cold enough for me!
Justin922 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 08:06 PM   #7
tjts1
Board Member
 
tjts1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Smellingham, WA
Default

Most of these easy to use R12 replacements are some combination of dried propane and butane.
I don't see why everybody is soo worried about the flamability of hydrocarbon based AC. We drive around with 10-20 gallons of gasoline in an unsealed container all the time. I don't think 14oz of propane scattered throughout the AC system are going to bring down the house.
For example the flash point of:
gasoline = -40C
propane = 68C
__________________

Greed is good.
tits for president
tjts1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 08:26 PM   #8
henry_sigourney
Board Member
 
henry_sigourney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lexington, MA
Default

I don't think the AC system was designed for flammable refrigerant in the context of a crash. The fuel system stops pumping when the engine stops turning.

AFAIK Freeze 12 is not flammable. Given the choice......
henry_sigourney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 08:31 PM   #9
fengler
Board Member
 
fengler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In the land of boredom
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cliff
I just called Envirosafe and they told me to use the Industrial 12a. They are in IL and love it in their cars and better for warmer climates like here in FL.

Anybody have Experience with Industrial 12a?

i do, i recently filled my system with it, LOVE IT. very cold, im surprised more people dont know about this( i didnt know about it till a month ago)
__________________

Vehicles i have or have had (in chrono order):
Random 5hp Go Kart
Random 5hp minibike
1979 Honda ct70
1984 Yamaha YZ125
1988 Honda CR250
1968 Ford Mustang
1989 Toyota Supra
1975 International Scout II
1992 Mazda Protege 5spd
1989 Volvo 744ti
1992 Suzuki GSXR 600w
2004 Dirt runner 50cc
1997 Suzuki TL1000s
1997 Volvo 855 T5
1984 Ford Mustang SVO
2001 Honda RC51
1998 BMW M3
Current - 2006 Toyota Highlander Hybrid (DD)
Current - 1972 Datsun 510 2-door

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazychopstick View Post
Fengler would totally smash.
fengler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 09:31 PM   #10
Tabor
volvoholic
 
Tabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Default

Duracool and Envirosafe:

They are flamable, but work better than Freeze 12. In fact, Envirosafe has a $3,000,000 insurance policy and no one has filed a claim yet.

Freeze 12: It is full of r134a which is highly toxic and can easily kill you if it leaks into the cabin in even the smallest amounts. Also, if it comes in contact with flame it turns into something even nastier (hydrofloric acid maybe, I can't remember).

Would you rather blow up with really cold AC or die from poisoning with moderately okay AC? I will take envirosafe thank you.

EDIT- And if the Envirosafe starts leaking into the cabin you will smell it because they add cent to it. The same can not be said for r134a/Freeze 12. I don't know about duracool.
__________________
1983 Volvo 245T with too many mods to list
1975 Volvo 242DL PARTING OUT pm me for parts!
Tabor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 09:37 PM   #11
boosted
Board Member
 
boosted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: melbourne, fl
Default

****, i breathe in r134a all the time
boosted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 10:06 PM   #12
765tiME
Board Member
 
765tiME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maine
Default

I was going to say...^^ ...I work in the toxic gas detection business and r134 has a fairly high exposure threshold before its deadly (like 100%), and only then because there is no oxygen left to breathe.

and you would have to contain the gas and heat it to about 1200C to generate HF (hydrogen fluoride).

The only real fear with any HFC is freeze burns (ok and environmental impact)
765tiME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 11:22 PM   #13
peehound
"Arf" she said.
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Exclamation

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tabor
Duracool and Envirosafe:

They are flamable, but work better than Freeze 12. In fact, Envirosafe has a $3,000,000 insurance policy and no one has filed a claim yet.

Freeze 12: It is full of r134a which is highly toxic and can easily kill you if it leaks into the cabin in even the smallest amounts. Also, if it comes in contact with flame it turns into something even nastier (hydrofloric acid maybe, I can't remember).
L0AD 'O SH**T
I can't remember, too, but I'm senile.
What's your excuse?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tabor
Would you rather blow up with really cold AC or die from poisoning with moderately okay AC? I will take envirosafe thank you.
Dumm da DUM dum....DUMB


Quote:
Originally Posted by Tabor
EDIT- And if the Envirosafe starts leaking into the cabin you will smell it because they add cent to it. The same can not be said for r134a/Freeze 12. I don't know about duracool.
What, exactly, DO you know about????
peehound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 11:32 PM   #14
blarf
Board Member
 
blarf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: disabled account land
Default

Err what? If it's EPA approved (as some of the hydrocarbon blends are), it's been tested for safety, but not for longevity in an automotive A/C system. If you're sticking with one of the EPA approved blends, I wouldn't worry about getting blown up anytime soon.
blarf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2006, 11:53 PM   #15
Tabor
volvoholic
 
Tabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Default

yarchive.net/ac/r134a_lethal.html

Quote:
In August 1997, a study was done at the Armstrong laboratory, Wright
Patterson Air Force Base, Dayton, OH. The report, "Human Inhalation of
Halon 1301, HFC-134a and HFC-227ea for Collection of Pharmacokinetic
Data" was authored by A. Vinegar, R. Cook, J McCafferty, M. Caracci, and
G. Jepson.

The concentration of R-134a being used was extremely low and (then
thought) that nothing bad was going to happen. To quote from the bottom
of page 10 (page 11 if abstract prepended), "Subject #3 was the first
volunteer exposed to

HFC-134a. The exposure concentration was 4000 ppm (0.4% v/v) and was
scheduled to last for 30 minutes with a 5 minute postexposure evaluation
period as was accomplished in the Halon 1301 portion of the study.
Approximately 4.5 minutes into the exposure, the subject lost
consciousness and both pulse and blood pressure dropped to zero."
Tabor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 12:33 AM   #16
765tiME
Board Member
 
765tiME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maine
Default

I can't speak to Armstrong Labs or whatever airforce base, I reference OSHA and ACGIH...

If you Google r134a and terms like PEL (permissable exposure limit) or TLV (threshold limit value), TWA (time weighted average) and OSHA (occupational safety and health association) you'll see there is no established exposure limit (trust me they do the testing and fine heavily). If you also Google MSDS (material safety data sheet) for the stuff you'll see its a simple asphyxiant (meaning avoid high concentrations where O2 can be depleted). I've pulled a couple of MSDSs on the gas and even as late as '04 its still without an exposure limit. I'd be leary of your primary source of info regarding toxicity. It may well be an asphyxiant at .4% by volume (can't happen leaking into the atmosphere unless super air tight).

Last edited by 765tiME; 06-23-2006 at 12:40 AM..
765tiME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 12:49 AM   #17
Tabor
volvoholic
 
Tabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Default

www.pioneerair.com/MSDS_R134a.pdf

OSHA has never established an exposure limit, true. If this means anything to you, go ahead, breath it all day. However, DuPont, the f***ing inventor of the god damn chemical (and patent holder, I may stress) has established a maximum exposure limit of only 1,000ppm. That is 0.1% by volume. If you think that dumping a couple of pounds of r134a into the cabin of a sedan can't get the concentration up to 0.1% by volume, I have a very shiny bridge to sell you.
Tabor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 12:54 AM   #18
Tabor
volvoholic
 
Tabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by boosted
****, i breathe in r134a all the time
It is causes testicular cancer.
Tabor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 01:06 AM   #19
fengler
Board Member
 
fengler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: In the land of boredom
Default

hahhaha gotta love two guys arguing about refrigerant
fengler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 01:07 AM   #20
765tiME
Board Member
 
765tiME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maine
Default

You're quoting speculation at this point. If it were proven of harming anything at all it would have an OSHA PEL and a TWA, ...again they really do all the testing. This is such BS though I will try to keep it off my balls.... Again I have been in gas detection (toxic and otherwise for nearly 20 years) so I ain't buying it.
765tiME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2006, 01:16 AM   #21
Tabor
volvoholic
 
Tabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Default

I'll buy the r134a if you'll breath it. 4000ppm for 30 min. You must supply the paramedics if you feel like being recesitated.
Tabor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2006, 02:18 AM   #22
Cliff
Board Member
 
Cliff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orlando, FL
Default

Thanks for the reply/arguing. I'll the envirosafe 12 later after I fix/tune my car.
Cliff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2006, 02:56 AM   #23
dalek
Benchracer Tribe
 
dalek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Gainesville, FL
Default

It seems EPA had a thing against Duracool 12a: http://www.epa.gov/Ozone/snap/refrigerants/hc-12a.html
__________________
"you can't leave your thingy hanging in public... you can get arrested."
"What's Arkansas supposed to be, Kansas for pirates?" Forg
"I think I can touch the tire. Damn! I can touch the tire! That hurts!" 240Psycho (on the back seat of my 94 Jetta while I was driving to a J/Y)
"Use the barbed adapter like what I use to inflate the air camping mattresses and my dates." FTF Engineering
i am inspired. i will replace my windsheild... with an intercooler.swedishK
dalek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2006, 12:53 PM   #24
JohnLane
Board Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Northern Washington
Default

Did it come with R-12? (yup)
Then put R-12 back in. It is available and works good.
__________________
Overkill is consistently more fun.

Impossible numbers guy!!
JohnLane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2006, 01:13 PM   #25
Tabor
volvoholic
 
Tabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnLane
Did it come with R-12? (yup)
Then put R-12 back in. It is available and works good.
How do you apply this logic to the rest of the components in your car?
Tabor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.