![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Board Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The PNW
|
...cause this B cam is terrible... I took the B out of my '82 245 that got wrecked, and replaced the T. I adjusted all the valves properly too.
Of course, the car pulls a lot less vacuum than it did before, and fuel economy definitely took a pretty good hit. Main problem is though, the 1st gear acceleration totally sucks (no torque I guess).. I mean, I barely creep off of the line unless I rev the engine to about 4,000 rpms before I go. I really loved the A cam that I put in my old 242, but I'm thinking that despite their similar specs, the B is just not a good turbo cam. Anyone else have this experience? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Mens Classic Fit Polo
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mr. Lee's Greater Hong Kong #28604
|
Are you absolutely positive that the cam is timed right?
I had a B cam in my car and it was only slightly less fun down low than the M cam.
__________________
![]() The Belgian Wonder B cam for sale Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Board Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The PNW
|
I'm pretty sure it's timed right, because when I get into boost, it pulls like hell. The car is just lacking a lot of low-end oomph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
one car, two bicycles
Join Date: May 2003
Location: caliper land
|
oops
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
one car, two bicycles
Join Date: May 2003
Location: caliper land
|
Quote:
or perhaps its just that kjet sucks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: sanction rescinded
|
The B only has ~7 thou more lift than an Acam does....and a LOT more overlap. The B doesn't come on until ~3000...if you have a decent flowing exhaust.
The overlap is not helping you out in a boosted context, nor does the later intake valve closing...which lowers the DCR a LOT more than does a T or an A. And with the lower SCR of a B21FT, you need all the DCR you can get. Advancing a Bcam ~4 degrees might help with the DCR a bit, but doing that will still not do anything about the much greater amount of overlap. So yeah, you're right: the B is not a good turbo cam, especially in a B21FT. TF |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
bigpimpin740t@yahoo.com
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham Al
|
i was about to send off an A, but he might rather have a B...
__________________
think you got shorted? belive me, we have piles of turbos and ms units, email me w/what ever the hell you think we have of yours and when i am not on a river ill dig it out and send it to ya for shipping, one shotbigpimpin740t@yahoo.com one down, whose next? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Drunk as ****
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: North 604...no 778
|
With a lumpier cam, you should be able to get away with more spark advance. Also, the kjet dizzies are curved to match the cam, so if you could get the distributor out of that donor car, throw the turbo vacuum diaphragm on there (for boost retard) that will help too.
__________________
1995 945Ti, cushy winter ride aka Darth Wagon 2006 Suzuki GSF650 Bandit |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Can play the blues
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: S NJ, a suburb of Phila.
|
You can do this or that. But even Volvo realized the B cam isn't as good for a turbo engine than the A cam. This is most likely why they went to the A cam when they introduced the B230ET instead of using the B that was in the prior B23ET. Try an A in there, advanced a few degrees if you want to use a Volvo cam.
__________________
Dave, 1982 242 turbo. MVP coilover front and rear suspension. Bilstein HD. IPD 25/25 bars. 3" MVP exhaust. Cosworth Sierra hot side T3 .48 with upgraded stock .42 compressor. Ported 90+.True Track diff. Flat hood 1979 front grill Ecode park/turn lights with H4 Hella. 321k miles. Had it since 1995. 1993 245 Classic, 340k miles, enem V15. Genuine Volvo stock over the axle exhaust. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: sanction rescinded
|
Good point there, Athal. Although, if he's running an old style manifold/stock size exhaust, the overlap is killing things with the reversion. But yeah, advance curves that match the cam would be a lot of help.
TF |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Board Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The PNW
|
yeah old style manifold stock exhaust. i'm poor, sorry. can't afford to buy another cam right now, so I'm just going to put the T back in. One day I'll get a real cam in there.
that's interesting about the distributor advance curves, i did not know that |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
The Sirius/Nova Police
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: northern Wales, UK
|
Quote:
__________________
Mike Lost my 2004 V40 GDI sport lux in local flooding last november, currently driving a Mercedes E430 avantgarde with prins LPG system (Sorry guys it is fun though) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Board Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The PNW
|
Well, I finally got around to replacing the B with the T, and man, what a difference. The car runs better, idles smoother, and is a lot, lot faster off the line.
Take home message: B-cam is not a good turbo cam, especially with stock K-Jet engine management. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Section 9
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Horizons Cave
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
LH 2.2'ing it up
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
There's a B cam in the orange beasty [b230ft, LH 2.2] - I agree it is a dog off of the line. Past that though it's pretty fine but I still think I might swap it out eventually.
__________________
- Patrick ![]() 1983 244ti SCCA ITE road race car [94' B230FT, gt3071r, t5, funstuff galore] 1979 Chevy Camaro Hobby Stock dirt track race car 1998 Dodge Ram 3500 Cummins Dually to haul ^^ 1996 850R m56 daily driver 1973 1800es restomod project I am building for my mom [b230ft, lh 2.2, 16t, t5 trans] never forget Doug Williams, Peter Gray & Matthew Dionne. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
The Rev
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wolcott, NY
|
I was under the same impression which is why I installed one in preparation for a +T. To the origional poster even NA it's my experience that the B doesn't have much below 2500rpm.
__________________
98 v70xc running, needs an m66 and full stage 0. 98 v70 5spd- RIP 91 240 +T - RIP, it was fun while it lasted. 79 262c, still currently under construction, but now actually under active construction. Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
The Sirius/Nova Police
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: northern Wales, UK
|
US engines must be weird.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Jesus Christ...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toledo, OH
|
hmmm autotragic... + kcam timed straight up = not nearly as crappy to drive as I assumed it would be... infact... it lags about as much as my old setup did with a tcam... given the compression hit from a cracked exhast valve on the number 1 didn't help... but it essentially feels the same... except it doesn't drop off at 4k.... that just happens to be where things get really interesting... still havn't takin it past 5... spent so long driving on a tcam I'm used to letting it shift early...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
The Sirius/Nova Police
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: northern Wales, UK
|
thats whats making me thing there not put in properly. i ran a B21A with K cam and that pulled nicely from 2000 up, just got harder and harder with more revs.
B23ET with B cam make peak torque around 3200-3500rpm and are a fairly civilised camshaft. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
LH 2.2'ing it up
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
|
How much vacuum are you pulling with the B cam BTW?
I'm pulling about 15-16in which really is'nt so bad............ |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: sanction rescinded
|
Quote:
I recently finished up a B to T changeover in a B23F/Kjet. The driveability improvement was considerable. A lot more torque in normal everyday around town driving AND on the highways at legal speeds. MPGs are up as well. ...this in a 245 with AW70/3.91 and with 2.5in exhaust all the way back. I also did a M to T changeover in a 92 245. Similar results: more torque. Dale [245gti] said a long time ago that the T is a stump puller in a B23... It is. TF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Can play the blues
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: S NJ, a suburb of Phila.
|
If you are pulling 15-16 in hg at hot idle. I would check your valve lash. That cam should be pulling about 18-22inhg at idle. The T cam used to pull about 20in hg and my enem V15 turbo pulls 19in hg at hot idle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Turbo, what?
Join Date: May 2004
Location: OR
|
FWIW, I drove a B cam and an A cam back to back on the drag strip this past weekend. Both AT cars, both with stock exhausts, both with modified intakes. A cam was in LH2.4 with no advanced timing, B cam was in LH2.2 with 3 degree advanced timing. The B cam didn't seem to give up much of anything off the line(60ft times were about the same, despite the fact that the 2.2 car was at least 100lb lighter), and continued to pull a little higher up than the A cam did in my car. Advance the timing in the 2.4 car with the A cam, and I'm sure it'd be faster off the line than the 2.2 and B cam car.
In NA mode, the A cam has a tad more torque off the line(down low) than the B cam, which has a bit more torque up top instead. And as others have said, the A cam is the better turbo cam, for obvious reasons. More power down low to get the turbo spooling. May not pull as hard as a B at redline, but it'll be more driveable. All things considered, I want my V15NA cam back in(this weekend?
__________________
Kyle - NLMGG: '91 244 NA DD/Track - General Leif: '71 142 b230 Chumpcar - Oregon Volvo Tuners? - For Sale? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|