![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Board Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairport, NY
|
![]() This should work. Change the rear corner weight as appropriate, and specify the spring length and lb/in. Everything is in reference to the first one, which should be a Nivomat.
Mk I Spring Rate Calculator
__________________
-- John Werner * 1992 944T * 1988 764 GLE V6 * 2002 WRX Wagon (needs motor) * 2013 Subaru Outback 3.6R *
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
cone dodging dilettante
Join Date: May 2015
Location: In bed, probably
|
![]() Some navel-gazing about stock rates here: http://forums.turbobricks.com/showth...85#post6064885
__________________
1993 944 B230FT/M90 thread here: http://forums.turbobricks.com/showthread.php?t=345277 2x 1991 245 B230F/M47 (LeMons car, street car) I sell chips for LH 2.4! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
The MP
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 38° 27' N 75° 29' W
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
na
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
![]() I was able to get some spring data from our friends at Lesjofors and they gave me permission to publish it :o)
Lesjofors {part number} {description} --- L: {length} OD: {outer diameter} WD: {wire diameter} R: {spring rate} ################ Lesjofors 4095801 240 front --- L: 452 mm OD: 167 mm WD: 13.5 mm R: 15.3 N/mm (87.4 lbf/in) Lesjofors 4095802 240 diesel front --- L: 485 mm OD: 166 mm WD: 13.5 mm R: 17.5 N/mm (100 lbf/in) Lesjofors 4295801 240 sedan rear --- L: 422 mm OD: 127 mm WD: 12 mm R: 17.2 N/mm (98.3 lbf/in) Lesjofors 4295803 240 wagon rear --- L: 407 mm OD: 134 mm WD: 13 mm R: 21.1 N/mm (121 lbf/in) Lesjofors 4295816 240 ambulance rear --- L: 410 mm OD: 132 mm WD: 14 mm R: 30.0 N/mm (171 lbf/in) Lesjofors 4595804 240 sedan sport kit (35 mm lower) --- R front: 29 N/mm (166 lbf/in) R rear: 26-35 N/mm (147-200 lbf/in) Lesjofors 4595805 240 wagon sport kit (40 mm lower) --- R front: 29 N/mm (166 lbf/in) R rear:23-33 N/mm (131-188 lbf/in) The sport kits have progressive rate in the rear. I also verified that the sport kit's rear rates are lower for the wagon.
__________________
1992 volvo 240 wagon, black: > tire: 225/60R15 bfgoodrich radial t/a > suspension: 23/19mm f/r arb + koni sports > drivetrain: m47II + 4.10 + wavetrac > engine: b230F + a-cam + tube headers > misc: 5lb lithium battery Last edited by sloopy; 03-10-2021 at 11:40 AM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
cone dodging dilettante
Join Date: May 2015
Location: In bed, probably
|
![]() Who did you contact at Lesjofors for spring rates? That's very interesting. I wonder what they're willing to tell me for 740/940 springs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
na
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
![]() I talked to Jim at the Pennsylvania office. I can PM you his number.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | ||
Ronald Culberbone III
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Redmond, OR
|
![]() Quote:
Any chance you can get the 240 diesel spring rate for the front? I had a pair that were a slight lift over stock and a go of bit stiffer.
__________________
Cult Person. Pissing in your Kool-Aid. Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
na
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
na
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Dallas, Texas
|
![]() I updated the table with data for the 240 diesel front spring.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
cone dodging dilettante
Join Date: May 2015
Location: In bed, probably
|
![]() Jim says no rates for 740/940. They're kept by the applications engineers in Sweden. Now, they do publish wire diameters, along with diameter and length, and maybe they're made from the same material as the 240 springs...
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 |
The MP
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 38° 27' N 75° 29' W
|
![]() The material used has almost no variation within the iron alloy family. But when measuring the spring, knowing the coating is important. Powdercoating can add a mm to the wire thickness, most paints 0.5ish mm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Czechia
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Turbonetics power!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oxnard
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 |
The MP
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 38° 27' N 75° 29' W
|
![]() Not me. Early on in this project i hoped to borrow lots of springs like that and measure them. I did borrow a few sets, like some of the lowering springs.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
![]() Hey everyone! I'm looking for some advice for my 81 245 on STS coilovers and lowering springs with an adjustable perch in the rear. The rear still feels like a pogo stick, thinking it might be too stiff after installing chevy S10 front shocks for my rear.
Here's the run down of what I've installed onto my wagon. 1. STS coilovers, 325lb fronts and 275lb rears, bilstein touring struts in the front and Chevy S10 front shocks for the rear -> I'm thinking this is my problem, too stiff for the wagon? I'm fairly low in the front, so it feels perfect with my BBS RC090. I can barely fit my pinky inside from top of the tire and fender. 2. Rear end is where my concerns at. I've completely taken out both bump stomps and the one by the diff, but I believe I'm still hitting the rear crossmember. 3. kaplhenke panhard bar, IPD torque rods and poly trailing arm bushings. Any help would be much appreciated! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
The MP
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 38° 27' N 75° 29' W
|
![]() You can start a new thread in performance, but the main thing i see is you have not factored in the rear control arm motion ratio (squared).
Multiply the rear spring rate by 1.5 and that is what the vertical rate is. The front loses a little bit (5%) due to the angle. Also, s10 shocks only work with 11” springs or shorter. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Slow Learner
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Rochester NY
|
![]() 1974 164:
Front springs Wire diameter - USA - 16.7 mm = .657”………Other - 16.4mm = .646” Outer diameter - USA - 126.7mm = 4.99”……..Other - 126.mm = 4.97” Springing coils - 8.4 Load - USA - 7239-7730 N…….Other - 6429-6920 N Length fully compressed - USA - 135.3mm = 5.33”… ….Other - 132.3mm = 5.21” Spring Length - USA - 202.4 = 7.968”………Other - 199.5mm - 7.854” Rear springs Wire diameter - 12mm = 0.472” Outer diameter - 128mm = 5.04” Springing coils - 8 Load - 2070-2207 N = 464-495 lb Length fully compressed - 112mm = 4.41” Spring length - 287mm - 11.3” Last edited by rearwheelpeel; 12-18-2021 at 06:21 PM.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
The MP
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 38° 27' N 75° 29' W
|
![]() Excellent. Thanks.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
Who engineered this?
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Atlanta
|
![]() This might need its own topic, but let’s say you were going from a completely stock suspension to a bne coil over set up on a 240 wagon. Koni yellow shocks/struts. What spring rate would you want to run and what length? Let’s say we’re setting the car up to autox and/or do some laps around road Atlanta.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 | |
Board Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Oregon
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
The MP
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 38° 27' N 75° 29' W
|
![]() When Towery started with the stock car spring idea, he went with 11# tall by 5" dia 200# in rear. I inherited those springs, and went from there. This was when we were treating the rear like most other cars with the spring on the axle or on a strut.
After learning about motion ratios, and going all over in rates, I have found that 13" 225# in the rear of a sedan (337.5# vert, less in roll), with 9" tall 5.5" pigtails, 350# in front (close to the rear number in vert due to the strut inclination) was very good. Not too stiff, very good handling with 23mm front, 19mm rear bars. 1" or so lower than stock. In my current wagon I have 13" 275# rear (412.5# in vert) with suburban Gabriel Ultras and 425# in front with very stiff bilsteins. This will be for rallycross and autocross. In my first wagon I originally ran the 275s in rear with the 350s in front, and it was awkward on concrete and bridges. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
The MP
Join Date: May 2003
Location: 38° 27' N 75° 29' W
|
![]() The Koni yellows handled the 350# springs well in front.
I think the reason that some suburban shocks (1" shorter than stock at the shock, but even shorter at the spring) don't work well on the rear of a 240 is that the stroke is really slowed down at the shock. The gabriel ultras are not know for finesse, which works better at the slower stroke rate when installed in a 240. The bilstein shocks that came stock on the front of the 88(?)s10 4x4 did very well with a 3"-4" drop and very stiff springs. I still have the set I used on the rallycross 244. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|